首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Medicine >A comprehensive analysis comparing the eighth AJCC gastric cancer pathological classification to the seventh sixth and fifth editions
【2h】

A comprehensive analysis comparing the eighth AJCC gastric cancer pathological classification to the seventh sixth and fifth editions

机译:第八版AJCC胃癌病理分类与第七版第六版和第五版的综合分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To perform a comprehensive analysis comparing the prognostic and discriminative ability of the eighth AJCC gastric cancer (GC) pathological classification to that of the seventh, sixth and fifth editions, and secondly to assess their long‐term significance. Patients who had undergone R0 gastrectomy were identified and restaged accordingly. To evaluate and confirm any difference in prognostic ability between the competing editions, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were computed and compared since both have different analytic strengths. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% CI based on the time‐dependent receiver‐operating characteristics analyses were also calculated to assess any change in prognostic rankings from the first to tenth postoperative year. The rankings calculated by both statistical methods showed similar results, in which the seventh edition was identified as possessing the best prognostic ability. Additionally, these ranks were found to remain consistent over the ten postoperative years, but demonstrated no clinical significance as their respective 95% CIs calculated by the AIC, BIC, and AUC were found to overlap. However, the more detailed staging classifications of the eighth edition was shown to display the best prognostic demarcation for stratifying patients with higher‐staged disease. This study thereby identified the eighth AJCC GC edition to possess similar long‐term prognostic ability as to its previous three editions but contrastingly demonstrated the best distinctive ability for stratifying overall survival and can thus be considered as being clinically more reliable.
机译:要进行全面分析,比较第八版AJCC胃癌(GC)病理分类与第七版,第六版和第五版的预后和判别能力,其次评估其长期意义。确定接受过R0胃切除术的患者并相应地对其进行再分期。为了评估和确认不同版本之间的预后能力差异,计算并比较了Akaike信息标准(AIC)和贝叶斯信息标准(BIC),因为两者具有不同的分析优势。还计算了基于时间依赖性接受者操作特征分析的具有95%CI的曲线下面积(AUC),以评估术后第一年至第十年的预后排名的任何变化。两种统计方法计算出的排名结果相似,其中第七版被认为具有最好的预后能力。此外,发现这些等级在术后十年中保持一致,但由于AIC,BIC和AUC计算的它们各自的95%CI重叠,因此没有临床意义。但是,第八版的更详细的分期分类显示出了对具有较高疾病分期的患者进行分层的最佳预后分界。因此,本研究确定了第八版AJCC GC版本具有与之前的三个版本相似的长期预后能力,但相反地证明了对整体生存进行分层的最佳区分能力,因此可以认为其在临床上更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号