首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Ageing >Migrants’ decision-process shaping work destination choice: the case of long-term care work in the United Kingdom and Norway
【2h】

Migrants’ decision-process shaping work destination choice: the case of long-term care work in the United Kingdom and Norway

机译:移民的决策过程塑造工作目的地选择:英国和挪威的长期护理工作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Escalating demands for formal long-term care (LTC) result in the reliance on migrant workers in many developed countries. Within Europe, this is currently framed by progressive European immigration policies favouring inter-European mobility. Using the UK and Norway as case studies, this article has two main aims: (1) to document changes in the contribution of European Union (EU) migrants to the LTC sectors in Western Europe, and (2) to gain further understanding of migrants’ decision-processes relating to destination and work choices. The UK and Norway provide examples of two European countries with different immigration histories, welfare regimes, labour market characteristics and cultural values, offering a rich comparison platform. The analysis utilizes national workforce datasets and data obtained from migrants working in the LTC sector in the UK and Norway (n = 248) and other stakeholders (n = 136). The analysis establishes a significant increase in the contribution of EU migrants (particularly from Eastern Europe) to the LTC sector in both the UK and Norway despite their different welfare regimes. The findings also highlight how migrant care workers develop rational decision-processes influenced by subjective perspectives of investments and returns within a context of wider structural migration barriers. The latter includes welfare and social care policies framing the conditions for migrants’ individual actions.
机译:对正规长期护理(LTC)的需求不断增长,导致许多发达国家对移民工人的依赖。在欧洲内部,目前这是由有利于欧洲人间流动的渐进式欧洲移民政策所决定的。本文以英国和挪威为案例研究,有两个主要目标:(1)记录欧盟移民对西欧LTC部门的贡献的变化;(2)进一步了解移民与目的地和工作选择有关的决策过程。英国和挪威提供了两个欧洲国家的示例,这些国家具有不同的移民历史,福利制度,劳动力市场特征和文化价值,并提供了丰富的比较平台。该分析利用了国家劳动力数据集以及从英国和挪威(n = 248)的LTC部门工作的移民和其他利益相关者(n = 136)获得的数据。分析表明,尽管欧盟和欧盟的福利制度不同,但欧盟移民(尤其是东欧移民)对LTC部门的贡献显着增加。研究结果还强调了移民护理人员如何在更广泛的结构性移民壁垒范围内,受投资和回报的主观观点影响,制定合理的决策程序。后者包括福利和社会护理政策,这些政策为移民的个人行动奠定了条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号