首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Behavioral Medicine >Implementation strategies to promote community-engaged efforts to counter tobacco marketing at the point of sale
【2h】

Implementation strategies to promote community-engaged efforts to counter tobacco marketing at the point of sale

机译:实施战略以促进社区参与以打击销售点上的烟草销售

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The US tobacco industry spends $8.2 billion annually on marketing at the point of sale (POS), a practice known to increase tobacco use. Evidence-based policy interventions (EBPIs) are available to reduce exposure to POS marketing, and nationwide, states are funding community-based tobacco control partnerships to promote local enactment of these EBPIs. Little is known, however, about what implementation strategies best support community partnerships’ success enacting EBPI. Guided by Kingdon’s theory of policy change, Counter Tools provides tools, training, and other implementation strategies to support community partnerships’ performance of five core policy change processes: document local problem, formulate policy solutions, engage partners, raise awareness of problems and solutions, and persuade decision makers to enact new policy. We assessed Counter Tools’ impact at 1 year on (1) partnership coordinators’ self-efficacy, (2) partnerships’ performance of core policy change processes, (3) community progress toward EBPI enactment, and (4) salient contextual factors. Counter Tools provided implementation strategies to 30 partnerships. Data on self-efficacy were collected using a pre-post survey. Structured interviews assessed performance of core policy change processes. Data also were collected on progress toward EBPI enactment and contextual factors. Analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics and content analysis. Following 1-year exposure to implementation strategies, coordinators’ self-efficacy increased significantly. Partnerships completed the greatest proportion of activities within the “engage partners” and “document local problem” core processes. Communities made only limited progress toward policy enactment. Findings can inform delivery of implementation strategies and tests of their effects on community-level efforts to enact EBPIs.
机译:美国烟草业每年在销售点(POS)的营销上花费82亿美元,这种做法已知会增加烟草的使用。可以采用基于证据的政策干预措施(EBPI)来减少对POS营销的接触,并且在全国范围内,各州都在资助基于社区的烟草控制合作伙伴关系,以促进这些EBPI在当地的制定。但是,对于哪种实施策略最能支持社区伙伴关系成功制定EBPI的知之甚少。以金登(Kingdon)的政策变更理论为指导,Counter Tools提供工具,培训和其他实施策略,以支持社区合作伙伴执行五个核心政策变更流程:记录本地问题,制定政策解决方案,吸引合作伙伴,提高对问题和解决方案的意识,并说服决策者制定新政策。我们评估了Counter Tools在以下方面的影响:(1)伙伴关系协调员的自我效能,(2)伙伴关系在核心政策变更流程中的表现,(3)社区在EBPI制定方面取得的进展以及(4)明显的背景因素。 Counter Tools为30个合作伙伴提供了实施策略。使用事前调查收集关于自我效能的数据。结构化的访谈评估了核心政策变更流程的绩效。还收集了有关EBPI制定进展情况和上下文因素的数据。分析包括描述性和双变量统计以及内容分析。经过一年的实施策略接触后,协调员的自我效能大大提高。伙伴关系在“参与伙伴”和“记录本地问题”核心流程中完成了最大比例的活动。社区在政策制定方面仅取得了有限的进展。研究结果可以为实施策略的交付和对它们对制定EBPI的社区层面努力的影响进行测试提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号