首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >Governing Well in Community-Based Research: Lessons from Canada’s HIV Research Sector on Ethics Publics and the Care of the Self
【2h】

Governing Well in Community-Based Research: Lessons from Canada’s HIV Research Sector on Ethics Publics and the Care of the Self

机译:在基于社区的研究中表现良好:加拿大艾滋病毒研究部门的道德公众和自我保健方面的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, we extend Michel Foucault’s final works on the ‘care of the self’ to an empirical examination of research practice in community-based research (CBR). We use Foucault’s ‘morality of behaviors’ to analyze interview data from a national sample of Canadian CBR practitioners working with communities affected by HIV. Despite claims in the literature that ethics review is overly burdensome for non-traditional forms of research, our findings suggest that many researchers using CBR have an ambivalent but ultimately productive relationship with institutional research ethics review requirements. They understand and use prescribed codes, but adapt them in practice to account for the needs of participating community members, members of their research teams and the larger communities with whom they work. Complying with ethics protocols was seen as only the beginning, a minimum standard; our research suggests that the real ethical work happens in the field, where CBR practitioners encounter community members in diverse public roles and must forge ethical consensus across communities. CBR represents an ethical terrain in which practitioners challenge themselves to work differently, and as a result they care for themselves—and others—in ways that often resist the propensity for domination through public health research.
‘…there are different ways to “conduct oneself” morally, different ways for the acting individual to operate, not just as an agent, but as an ethical subject of action.’ (Foucault, 1985: 26)
机译:在本文中,我们将米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)关于“关爱自我”的最终著作扩展到对基于社区的研究(CBR)中的研究实践进行实证检验。我们使用福柯的“行为道德”来分析来自与受艾滋病毒感染社区合作的加拿大CBR从业人员的全国样本的访谈数据。尽管在文献中声称道德审查对于非传统形式的研究而言过于繁重,但我们的发现表明,许多使用CBR的研究人员与机构研究伦理审查要求之间存在矛盾但最终富有成果的关系。他们理解并使用规定的代码,但在实践中对其进行了调整,以适应参与社区成员,其研究团队成员以及与之合作的更大社区的需求。遵守道德规范协议只是开始的最低标准。我们的研究表明,真正的道德工作发生在该领域,CBR从业人员在社区中以各种公共角色遇到社区成员,必须在社区之间建立道德共识。社区康复代表了一个道德领域,从业者挑战自我以不同的方式工作,结果他们以经常抵制公共卫生研究倾向的方式来照顾自己和他人。 <...……有不同的道德上“操守自己”的方式,不同的方式使行动的个人不仅作为代理人,而且作为道德行为主体进行操作。”(Foucault,1985: 26)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号