首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Juggling law ethics and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
【2h】

Juggling law ethics and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions

机译:杂耍法律道德和直觉:尴尬问题的实用答案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The eclectic problem solving methodology used by the British Medical Association (BMA) is described in this paper. It has grown from the daily need to respond to doctors' practical queries and incorporates reference to law, traditional professional codes, and established BMA policies—all of which must be regularly assessed against the benchmark of contemporary societal expectations. The two Jehovah's Witness scenarios are analysed, using this methodology and in both cases the four principles solution is found to concur with that of the BMA's approach. The author's overall conclusion is that although the BMA resorts to a lengthier list of thins to consider, the solutions that emerge are often likely to coincide with the four principles approach.
机译:本文描述了英国医学协会(BMA)使用的折衷问题解决方法。它已经从每天响应医生的实际需求而发展,并结合了对法律,传统专业守则和已建立的BMA政策的引用-所有这些都必须定期根据当代社会期望的基准进行评估。使用这种方法分析了耶和华见证人的两种情况,在这两种情况下,发现四个原则的解决方案与BMA的方法是一致的。作者的总体结论是,尽管BMA采取了更长的考虑范围,但出现的解决方案通常可能与四项原则相吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号