首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pathobiology >The Changing Role of Pathology in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
【2h】

The Changing Role of Pathology in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

机译:病理学在乳腺癌诊断和治疗中的作用不断变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pathological examination has been the gold standard for diagnosis in cancer and its role has also included the elucidation of etiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological correlation, and prognostication. The advent of newer technologies and the realization that breast cancer is heterogeneous has shifted the focus to prognostication, with increased attention being paid to the identification of morphological features and immunohistochemical markers of prognostic relevance. However, despite the massive efforts invested in the identification of immunohistochemical biomarkers in breast cancer the majority have not proven to be of value in multivariate analyses and only estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2eu expression have remained essential components of pathological examination. These 3 markers were initially employed for prognostication but their role in treatment also rendered them of predictive value. Newer molecular methods, especially high-throughput technologies, have shown that even morphologically similar subtypes of breast cancer can show molecular heterogeneity; moreover, infiltrating ductal carcinoma can be separated into at least 4 molecular subtypes designated luminal (ER+, PR+, and Her2eu–), Her2 overexpressing (ER–, PR–, and Her2eu+), basal-like (ER–, PR–, Her2eu–, and CK5/6+, EGFR+), and normal breast-like (ER–, PR–, and Her2eu–), each with different clinical outcomes. The importance of proliferative gene expression in these subtypes has been demonstrated and surrogate immunohistochemical markers include ER, PR, Her2eu, and Ki67 for the more expensive molecular tests. Molecular technologies, importantly, have not only provided further insights into the heterogeneity of breast cancer but have also opened new avenues for treatment through the identification of signaling molecules important in the proliferation and survival of the neoplastic cells. The treatment of cancer thus shifts from the conventional approach of ‘one size fits all’ to one of personalized treatment tailored to the specific characteristics of the tumor. Pathologists continue to play their traditional role in diagnosis but, as purveyors of the excised tissue, pathologists now have the additional role of identifying biomarkers responsive to therapeutic manipulation, thus playing an inextricable role as diagnostic oncologists in the management of breast cancer.
机译:病理检查一直是诊断癌症的金标准,其作用还包括阐明病因,发病机理,临床病理相关性和预后。较新技术的出现和人们认识到乳腺癌是异质性的,已经将重点转移到了预后上,人们越来越重视对预后相关性的形态学特征和免疫组化标志物的鉴定。然而,尽管投入了大量精力来鉴定乳腺癌中的免疫组织化学生物标志物,但大多数仍未在多元分析中证明其价值,只有雌激素受体,孕激素受体和Her2 / neu表达仍是病理学检查的重要组成部分。这3种标志物最初被用于预后,但它们在治疗中的作用也使其具有预测价值。较新的分子方法,特别是高通量技术,表明即使在形态上相似的乳腺癌亚型也可表现出分子异质性。此外,浸润性导管癌可分为至少4种分子亚型,分别称为腔管型(ER +,PR +和Her2 / neu –),Her2过表达(ER–,PR–和Her2 / neu +),基底样(ER–, PR–,Her2 / neu–和CK5 / 6 +,EGFR +)和正常乳腺样病变(ER–,PR–和Her2 / neu–),每种都有不同的临床结果。已经证明了在这些亚型中增殖基因表达的重要性,并且对于更昂贵的分子测试,替代的免疫组织化学标记包括ER,PR,Her2 / neu和Ki67。重要的是,分子技术不仅为乳腺癌的异质性提供了进一步的见解,而且还通过鉴定对肿瘤细胞的增殖和存活重要的信号分子开辟了新的治疗途径。因此,癌症的治疗已从传统的“一刀切”方法转变为针对肿瘤特定特征的个性化治疗方法。病理学家继续在诊断中发挥其传统作用,但是作为切除组织的提供者,病理学家现在还具有识别对治疗操作有反应的生物标志物的额外作用,因此在诊断乳腺癌中扮演着诊断肿瘤学家不可分割的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号