首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Experimental Botany >To clean or not to clean phenotypic datasets for outlier plants in genetic analyses?
【2h】

To clean or not to clean phenotypic datasets for outlier plants in genetic analyses?

机译:在基因分析中要清除还是不清除异常植物的表型数据集?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Based on case studies, we discuss the extent to which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are affected by outlier plants, i.e. those deviating from the expected distribution on a multi-criteria basis. Using a raw dataset consisting of daily measurements of leaf area, biomass, and plant height for thousands of plants, we tested three different cleaning methods for their effects on genetic analyses. No-cleaning resulted in the highest number of dubious quantitative trait loci, especially at loci with highly unbalanced allelic frequencies. A trade-off was identified between the risk of false-positives (with no-cleaning and/or a low threshold for minor allele frequency) and the risk of missing interesting rare alleles. Cleaning can lower the risk of the latter by making it possible to choose a higher threshold in GWAS.
机译:基于案例研究,我们讨论了离群植物对全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的影响程度,即那些在多准则基础上偏离预期分布的植物。使用原始数据集,其中包括对数千种植物的叶面积,生物量和植物高度的每日测量,我们测试了三种不同的清洁方法对遗传分析的影响。不清洗导致数量最多的可疑数量性状基因座,尤其是在等位基因频率高度不平衡的基因座上。在假阳性(不清洗和/或较低的次要等位基因频率阈值)的风险与遗漏有趣的稀有等位基因的风险之间进行了权衡。清洁可以通过在GWAS中选择​​较高的阈值来降低后者的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号