首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA >Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma
【2h】

Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma

机译:使用知识驱动的基因组相互作用进行多组学数据分析:预测卵巢癌临床结局的元模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is common that cancer patients have different molecular signatures even though they have similar clinical features, such as histology, due to the heterogeneity of tumors. To overcome this variability, we previously developed a new approach incorporating prior biological knowledge that identifies knowledge-driven genomic interactions associated with outcomes of interest. However, no systematic approach has been proposed to identify interaction models between pathways based on multi-omics data. Here we have proposed such a novel methodological framework, called metadimensional knowledge-driven genomic interactions (MKGIs). To test the utility of the proposed framework, we applied it to an ovarian cancer dataset including multi-omics profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas to predict grade, stage, and survival outcome. We found that each knowledge-driven genomic interaction model, based on different genomic datasets, contains different sets of pathway features, which suggests that each genomic data type may contribute to outcomes in ovarian cancer via a different pathway. In addition, MKGI models significantly outperformed the single knowledge-driven genomic interaction model. From the MKGI models, many interactions between pathways associated with outcomes were found, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) signaling pathway, which are known to play important roles in cancer pathogenesis. The beauty of incorporating biological knowledge into the model based on multi-omics data is the ability to improve diagnosis and prognosis and provide better interpretability. Thus, determining variability in molecular signatures based on these interactions between pathways may lead to better diagnostic/treatment strategies for better precision medicine.
机译:由于肿瘤的异质性,即使癌症患者具有相似的临床特征(如组织学),也常常具有不同的分子特征。为了克服这种可变性,我们先前开发了一种新方法,该方法结合了先前的生物学知识,可以识别与目标结果相关的知识驱动的基因组相互作用。但是,尚未提出系统的方法来基于多组学数据识别途径之间的相互作用模型。在这里,我们提出了这样一种新颖的方法框架,称为元维度知识驱动的基因组相互作用(MKGI)。为了测试所提出框架的实用性,我们将其应用于卵巢癌数据集,包括来自The Cancer Genome Atlas的多组学概况,以预测等级,阶段和生存结果。我们发现,基于不同基因组数据集的每种知识驱动的基因组相互作用模型均包含不同的途径特征集,这表明每种基因组数据类型可能通过不同途径来促进卵巢癌的预后。此外,MKGI模型明显优于单一知识驱动的基因组相互作用模型。从MKGI模型中,发现与结果相关的途径之间存在许多相互作用,包括促分裂原激活的蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号途径和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)信号途径,它们在癌症发病机理中起着重要作用。将生物学知识整合到基于多组学数据的模型中,其美丽之处在于能够改善诊断和预后并提供更好的解释性。因此,基于途径之间的这些相互作用确定分子标记的变异性可能会导致更好的诊断/治疗策略,从而获得更好的精密医学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号