首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine >Reassessment of the prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index and the revised International Prognostic Index in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicentre study
【2h】

Reassessment of the prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index and the revised International Prognostic Index in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicentre study

机译:对弥散性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的国际预后指数和修订后的国际预后指数的预后价值的重新评估:一项多中心研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is a widely accepted model that is used to predict the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are treated using chemotherapy. However, the prognostic value of the IPI has been a focal point of debate in the immunochemotherapy era. The aim of this study was to reassess the value of the IPI and revised IPI (R-IPI) in a Chinese population. A multicentre retrospective analysis of DLBCL patients who were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP)-like chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus rituximab (R-CHOP-like) was performed. The prognostic values of IPI and R-IPI at the time of diagnosis with respect to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Among the 438 patients in the study, 241 received a CHOP-like regimen and 197 patients received an R-CHOP-like regimen. Although the IPI remained predictive for the CHOP-like group, it failed to distinguish between the various prognostic categories in the R-CHOP-like group. Notably, redistribution of the IPI factors into R-IPI factors identified three discrete prognostic groups with significantly different outcomes in both the CHOP-like and R-CHOP-like groups. In the R-CHOP-like group, these three risk groups, very good, good and poor, had distinctly different 3-year PFS rates of 96, 84.3 and 67.5% (P=0.001), and 3-year OS rates of 96, 87.6 and 71.1% (P=0.003), respectively. Our study demonstrates the power of the R-IPI as a simplified and more clinically relevant predictor of disease outcome than the standard IPI in DLBCL populations in the rituximab era. Therefore, the R-IPI merits further study in a larger population-based prospective study.
机译:国际预后指数(IPI)是一种广泛接受的模型,用于预测接受化学疗法治疗的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的预后。然而,IPI的预后价值一直是免疫化学治疗时代争论的焦点。这项研究的目的是重新评估IPI和修订后的IPI(R-IPI)在中国人口中的价值。对单用环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)样化疗或化疗加利妥昔单抗(R-CHOP样)治疗的DLBCL患者进行多中心回顾性分析。评估IPI和R-IPI在诊断时相对于总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的预后价值。在该研究的438例患者中,有241例接受了CHOP方案,而197例接受了R-CHOP方案。尽管IPI对于CHOP类组仍具有预测性,但未能区分R-CHOP类组的各种预后类别。值得注意的是,将IPI因子重新分配到R-IPI因子中可确定三个离散的预后组,在CHOP类和R-CHOP类组中,预后均显着不同。在类似R-CHOP的组中,这三个风险组,非常好,好和差,其3年PFS比率分别为96、84.3和67.5%(P = 0.001),3年OS比率为96 ,87.6%和71.1%(P = 0.003)。我们的研究表明,在利妥昔单抗时代,DLBCL人群中R-IPI较标准IPI具有更强的临床意义,并且是疾病结局的简化预测指标。因此,R-IPI值得在基于人群的前瞻性研究中进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号