首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine >Clinical observation on the treatment of acute liver failure by combined non-biological artificial liver
【2h】

Clinical observation on the treatment of acute liver failure by combined non-biological artificial liver

机译:非生物人工肝联合治疗急性肝衰竭的临床观察

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The clinical efficacy and safety of different combinations of non-bio artificial liver in the treatment of acute liver failure was examined. A total of 61 cases were selected under blood purification treatment from the patients with severe acute liver failure admitted to the severe disease department of the hospital from December, 2010 to December, 2015. Three types of artificial liver combinations were observed, i.e., plasma exchange plus hemoperfusion plus continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (PE+HP+CVVHDF), PE+CVVHDF and HP+CVVHDF. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory index (PaO2/FiO2), liver and kidney function indicator, as well as platelet and coagulation function were compared. A comparison before and after the treatment using the three methods, showed improvement in the HRs, MAPs, PaO2/FiO2, total bilirubins (TBIL) and alanine aminotransferases (ALT) (P<0.05), of which TBIL and ALT were decreased more significantly (P<0.01) in the PE+CVVHDF and PE+HP+CVVHDF groups. Only changes in the PE+HP+CVVHDF and PE+CVVHDF groups were statistically significant after prothrombin time and albumin treatment (P<0.05). The difference between the decrease in TBIL in the PE+HP+CVVHDF group and that in the HP+CVVHDF group was statistically significant (P<0.05). Treatment of the 61 patients using the artificial liver support system yielded a survival rate of 62.3% (38/61), and a viral survival rate of 35.0% (7/20); with the non-viral survival rate being 75.6% (31/41). In conclusion, following the treatment of three types of artificial livers, the function was improved to varying degrees, with the PE+HP+CVVHDF and the PE+CVVHDF method being better. By contrast, after the treatment of non-viral liver failure, the survival rate was significantly higher than the patients with viral liver failure.
机译:研究了非生物人工肝不同组合治疗急性肝衰竭的临床疗效和安全性。从2010年12月至2015年12月我院重症病房收治的严重急性肝功能衰竭患者中,共抽取血液净化治疗61例。观察到三种类型的人工肝联合治疗,即血浆置换加上血液灌流加上连续静脉血液透析滤过(PE + HP + CVVHDF),PE + CVVHDF和HP + CVVHDF。比较了心率(HR),平均动脉压(MAP),呼吸指数(PaO2 / FiO2),肝肾功能指标以及血小板和凝血功能。三种方法治疗前后的比较显示,HRs,MAPs,PaO2 / FiO2,总胆红素(TBIL)和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)均有改善(P <0.05),其中TBIL和ALT降低更明显在PE + CVVHDF和PE + HP + CVVHDF组中(P <0.01)。凝血酶原时间和白蛋白处理后,仅PE + HP + CVVHDF和PE + CVVHDF组的变化具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。 PE + HP + CVVHDFF组与HP + CVVHDFF组的TBIL降低之间的差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。使用人工肝支持系统治疗61例患者,生存率为62.3%(38/61),病毒生存率为35.0%(7/20);非病毒生存率为75.6%(31/41)。综上所述,经过三种人工肝的治疗,其功能得到了不同程度的改善,其中PE + HP + CVVHDF方法和PE + CVVHDFF方法较好。相比之下,在非病毒性肝衰竭的治疗后,存活率显着高于病毒性肝衰竭的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号