首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America >A Dual Point-of-Care Test Shows Good Performance in Simultaneously Detecting Nontreponemal and Treponemal Antibodies in Patients With Syphilis: A Multisite Evaluation Study in China
【2h】

A Dual Point-of-Care Test Shows Good Performance in Simultaneously Detecting Nontreponemal and Treponemal Antibodies in Patients With Syphilis: A Multisite Evaluation Study in China

机译:双重护理点测试显示在同时检测梅毒患者的非梅毒和梅毒抗体方面表现良好:在中国的一项多站点评估研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Rapid point-of-care (POC) syphilis tests based on simultaneous detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies (dual POC tests) offer the opportunity to increase coverage of syphilis screening and treatment. This study aimed to conduct a multisite performance evaluation of a dual POC syphilis test in China.>Methods. Participants were recruited from patients at sexually transmitted infection clinics and high-risk groups in outreach settings in 6 sites in China. Three kinds of specimens (whole blood [WB], fingerprick blood [FB], and blood plasma [BP]) were used for evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Syphilis Screen and Confirm test using its treponemal and nontreponemal lines to compare Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) assay and toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) as reference standards.>Results. A total of 3134 specimens (WB 1323, FB 488, and BP 1323) from 1323 individuals were collected. The sensitivities as compared with TPPA were 96.7% for WB, 96.4% for FB, and 94.6% for BP, and the specificities were 99.3%, 99.1%, and 99.6%, respectively. The sensitivities as compared with TRUST were 87.2% for WB, 85.8% for FB, and 88.4% for BP, and the specificities were 94.4%, 96.1%, and 95.0%, respectively. For specimens with a TRUST titer of 1:4 or higher, the sensitivities were 100.0% for WB, 97.8% for FB, and 99.6% for BP.>Conclusions. DPP test shows good sensitivity and specificity in detecting treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies in 3 kinds of specimens. It is hoped that this assay can be considered as an alternative in the diagnosis of syphilis, particularly in resource-limited areas.
机译:>背景。基于即时检测梅毒和非梅毒抗体(双重POC检测)的快速即时梅毒检测(双重POC检测)提供了扩大梅毒筛查和治疗覆盖率的机会。这项研究旨在对中国双重POC梅毒测试进行多站点性能评估。>方法。在中国6个站点的性传播感染门诊和高危人群中从患者中招募参与者。 。使用三种样本(全血[WB],指尖血[FB]和血浆[BP])评估双通道平台(DPP)梅毒筛查的敏感性和特异性,并通过其梅毒螺旋体和非梅毒螺旋体线进行确认试验以比较梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集(TPPA)测定法和甲苯胺红未加热血清试验(TRUST)作为参考标准。>结果。共有13134个样本(WB 1323,FB 488和BP 1323)来自1323收集个人。与TPPA相比,WB的敏感性为96.7%,FB的敏感性为96.4%,BP的敏感性为94.6%,特异性分别为99.3%,99.1%和99.6%。与TRUST相比,WB的敏感性为87.2%,FB的敏感性为85.8%,BP的敏感性为88.4%,特异度分别为94.4%,96.1%和95.0%。 TRUST滴度为1:4或更高的样本,WB的敏感性为100.0%,FB的敏感性为97.8%,BP的敏感性为99.6%。>结论。 DPP检测显示出良好的灵敏度和特异性。 3种标本中的链状和非链状抗体。希望可以将这种测定法视为梅毒诊断的替代方法,尤其是在资源有限的地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号