首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH >In-vitro investigation to evaluate the flexural bond strengths of three commercially available ultra low fusing ceramic systems to Grade II Titanium
【2h】

In-vitro investigation to evaluate the flexural bond strengths of three commercially available ultra low fusing ceramic systems to Grade II Titanium

机译:进行体外研究以评估三种市售的超低熔点陶瓷系统与II级钛的挠曲结合强度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: This in-vitro investigation was designed to compare the flexural bond strengths of three commercially available ultra low fusing ceramic systems to Grade II Titanium and evaluate the type of bond failure through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersion X ray Spectrum (EDS).>Materials & Methods: Sixty patterns of auto polymerizing resin of dimensions 25.1 mm X 3.1mm X 0.6mm each were fabricated from a stainless steel die. Titanium casting for all the samples was done in a Titanium casting machine. Ten samples were allotted to each of three groups randomly. Ceramic build up was done step by step using the manufacturers' instructions. Flexural Bond strength tests for the samples were performed by using a 3-point bending test on a Universal testing machine in compliance with Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) 13.927 draft. After the tests were completed, three samples, one from each group were selected randomly for the subsequent Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM) studies to characterize the type and morphology of the fracture in representative specimens.>Results: The maximum load to fracture the porcelain was recorded for each specimen. All the means of the three groups were compared by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and it was found that Group I & Group III had significantly higher bond strength values as compared with the Group II (P< 0.001). All the 10 samples of Group I & III gave bond strength values above the standard values of 25 MPa. There was statistically significant difference in the bond strengths between Group I & Group III (t = 2.76 and P< 0.05), between Group I & II (t = 5.09 and P< 0.001) and between Group II & Group III (t = 13.28 and P< 0.001). SEM studies revealed occurrence of cohesive type fractures in the ceramic body of samples belonging to Groups I & III, while there was adhesive failure at ceramo-metal junction of samples belonging to Group II. EDS Analysis supported the findings of SEM studies.>Conclusion: All the three ceramic systems fared better than the minimal recommended values stated by ISO 9693:1999 of 25MPa of which Orotig TiKrom was rated the best with values of 54.69 MPa. Vita TitanKeramik ranked second with values of 45.12MPa and the least values were obtained with Noritake Ti-22 with values of 27.76. The bond failure was predominantly cohesive in nature in case of Vita TitanKeramik and Orotig TiKrom; whereas adhesive failure was noticed in case of Noritake Ti-22.>How to cite this article: Mabrurkar V, Habbu N, Hashmi SW, Musani S, Joshi N. In-vitro investigation to evaluate the flexural bond strengths of three commercially available ultra low fusing ceramic systems to Grade II Titanium. J Int Oral Health 2013;5(5):101-7.
机译:>背景:该体外研究旨在比较三种市售超低熔陶瓷系统与II级钛的挠曲结合强度,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和扫描电镜评估结合失败的类型。能量色散X射线光谱(EDS)。>材料和方法:用不锈钢模具制作了60个尺寸为25.1 mm X 3.1mm X 0.6mm的自动聚合树脂图案。所有样品的钛铸都是在钛铸机上进行的。将十个样品随机分配到三组中的每组。陶瓷堆积是按照制造商的说明逐步进行的。通过在符合Deutsches InstitutfürNormung(DIN)13.927草案的Universal试验机上进行三点弯曲试验,对样品进行抗弯粘结强度试验。测试完成后,随机选择三个样品,每组一个,用于随后的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究,以表征代表性样品中的骨折类型和形态。>结果:记录每个样品的瓷破裂的载荷。通过单向方差分析(ANOVA)比较了三组的所有平均值,发现第一组和第三组的粘合强度值明显高于第二组(P <0.001)。 I和III组的所有10个样品的结合强度值均高于25 MPa的标准值。 I组和III组之间的​​粘合强度(t = 2.76和P <0.05),I&II组之间(t = 5.09和P <0.001)以及II组和III组之间的​​粘合强度(t = 13.28)有统计学上的显着差异和P <0.001)。 SEM研究表明,在属于I和III族的样品的陶瓷体中发生了内聚型断裂,而在属于II族的样品的陶瓷-金属接合处存在粘合破坏。 EDS分析支持SEM研究的结果。>结论:所有三种陶瓷系统的性能均优于ISO 9693:1999规定的25MPa的最小推荐值,其中Orotig TiKrom的最佳推荐值为54.69。 MPa。 Vita TitanKeramik以45.12MPa的数值排名第二,使用Noritake Ti-22的数值为27.76获得了最小值。对于Vita TitanKeramik和Orotig TiKrom,粘合失败本质上是内聚力。而在Noritake Ti-22的情况下发现了粘合失败。>如何引用本文: Mabrurkar V,Habbu N,Hashmi SW,Musani S和JoshiN。用于评估挠曲性的体外研究三种商用超低熔陶瓷系统对II级钛的强度。国际口腔卫生杂志2013; 5(5):101-7。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号