首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of the American Thoracic Society >What’s in a Name? Factors Associated with Documentation and Evaluation of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules
【2h】

What’s in a Name? Factors Associated with Documentation and Evaluation of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules

机译:名字叫什么?附带记录和评估肺结核的相关因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Rationale: Radiologist reports of pulmonary nodules discovered incidentally on computed tomographic (CT) images of the chest may influence subsequent evaluation and management.>Objectives: We sought to determine the impact of the terminology used by radiologists to report incidental pulmonary nodules on subsequent documentation and evaluation of the nodules by the ordering or primary care provider.>Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules detected on CT chest examinations performed during 2010 in a large urban safety net medical system located in northeastern Ohio.>Measurements and Main Results: Twelve different terms were used to describe 344 incidental pulmonary nodules. Most nodules (181 [53%]) were documented in a subsequent progress note by the provider, and 140 (41%) triggered subsequent clinical activity. In a multivariable analysis, incidental pulmonary nodules described in radiology reports using the terms density (odds ratio [OR], 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.47), granuloma (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01–0.65), or opacity (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.68) were less likely to be documented by the provider than those that used the term mass. Patients with nodules described in radiology reports using the term nodule (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02–0.99), nodular density (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.63), granuloma (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.69), or opacity (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.43) were less likely to receive follow-up than were patients with nodules described using the term mass. The factor most strongly associated with follow-up of pulmonary nodules was documentation by the provider (OR, 5.85; 95% CI, 2.93–11.7).>Conclusions: Within one multifacility urban health system in the United States, the terms used by radiologists to describe incidental pulmonary nodules were associated with documentation of the nodule by the ordering physician and subsequent follow-up. Standard terminology should be used to describe pulmonary nodules to improve patient outcomes.
机译:>原理:放射科医生报告在胸部CT图像上偶然发现的肺结节可能会影响后续评估和管理。>目的:我们试图确定这种影响放射科医生使用的术语来报告偶然的肺结节,以便随后的订购或初级保健提供者进行记录和评估。>方法:我们对在CT上发现偶然发现的肺结节的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。 2010年在俄亥俄州东北部的大型城市安全网医疗系统中进行了胸部检查。>测量和主要结果:使用了十二个不同的术语来描述344个附带的肺结节。提供者在随后的进度记录中记录了大多数结节(181 [53%]),并且140个(41%)触发了随后的临床活动。在多变量分析中,放射学报告中描述的偶发性肺结节使用术语密度(比值[OR],0.06; 95%置信区间[CI],0.01-0.47),肉芽肿(OR,0.07; 95%CI,0.01-0.01)。与使用质量一词的提供者相比,提供者记录的可能性较小(0.65)或不透明(OR为0.09; 95%CI为0.01-0.68)。放射学报告中有结节的患者使用结节(OR,0.15; 95%CI,0.02–0.99),结节密度(OR,0.09; 95%CI,0.01–0.63),肉芽肿(OR,0.06; 95%CI (0.01-0.69)或不透明(OR,0.05; 95%CI,0.01-0.43)与使用“质量”一词描述的结节患者相比,接受随访的可能性较小。与肺结节随访最密切相关的因素是提供者的文件记录(OR,5.85; 95%CI,2.93-11.7)。>结论:在美国的一个多设施城市卫生系统中,放射科医生用来描述偶发性肺结节的术语与订购医生的结节记录及随后的随访有关。应使用标准术语来描述肺结节以改善患者预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号