首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Occupational Therapy >Developmental Test of Visual–Motor Integration (VMI): An Effective Outcome Measure for Handwriting Interventions for Kindergarten First-Grade and Second-Grade Students?
【2h】

Developmental Test of Visual–Motor Integration (VMI): An Effective Outcome Measure for Handwriting Interventions for Kindergarten First-Grade and Second-Grade Students?

机译:视觉-马达整合(VMI)的发展测试:幼儿园一年级和二年级学生手写干预的有效结果指标?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We determined whether a widely used assessment of visual–motor skills, the Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual–Motor Integration (VMI), is appropriate for use as an outcome measure for handwriting interventions. A two-group pretest–posttest design was used with 207 kindergarten, first-grade, and second-grade students. Two well-established handwriting measures and the VMI were administered pre- and postintervention. The intervention group participated in the Size Matters Handwriting Program for 40 sessions, and the control group received standard instruction. Paired and independent-samples t tests were used to analyze group differences. The intervention group demonstrated significant improvements on the handwriting measures, with change scores having mostly large effect sizes. We found no significant difference in change scores on the VMI, t(202) = 1.19, p = .23. Results of this study suggest that the VMI may not detect changes in handwriting related to occupational therapy intervention.
机译:我们确定了广泛使用的视觉-运动技能评估,即视觉-运动融合的比利-布克滕尼察发展测验(VMI)是否适合用作手写干预的结果指标。 207名幼儿园,一年级和二年级学生采用了两组前测后测设计。干预前后均采用了两种行之有效的手写措施和VMI。干预小组参加了40项“大小事项手写计划”,对照组接受了标准指导。配对和独立样本t检验用于分析组差异。干预组显示出手写笔迹的显着改善,变化得分大多具有较大的影响力。我们发现VMI的变化得分没有显着差异,t(202)= 1.19,p = 0.23。这项研究的结果表明,VMI可能无法检测到与职业治疗干预有关的笔迹变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号