首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Predicting Effects of Psychological Inflexibility/Experiential Avoidance and Stress Coping Strategies for Internet Addiction Significant Depression and Suicidality in College Students: A Prospective Study
【2h】

Predicting Effects of Psychological Inflexibility/Experiential Avoidance and Stress Coping Strategies for Internet Addiction Significant Depression and Suicidality in College Students: A Prospective Study

机译:心理僵化/体验回避和压力应对策略对大学生网络成瘾严重抑郁和自杀的预测效果:一项前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aims of this study were to evaluate the predicting effects of psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance (PI/EA) and stress coping strategies for Internet addiction, significant depression and suicidality among college students during the follow-up period of one year. A total of 500 college students participated in this study. The level of PI/EA and stress coping strategies were evaluated initially. One year later, 324 participants were invited to complete the Chen Internet Addiction Scale, Beck Depression Inventory-II and the questionnaire for suicidality to evaluate depression symptoms and internet addiction and suicidality. The predicting effects of PI/EA and stress coping strategies were examined by using logistic regression analysis controlling for the effects of gender and age. The results indicated that PI/EA at the initial assessment increased the risk of Internet addiction (OR = 1.087, 95% CI: 1.042–1.135), significant depression (OR = 1.125, 95% CI: 1.081–1.170), and suicidality (OR = 1.099, 95% CI: 1.053–1.147) at the follow-up assessment. Less effective coping at the initial assessment also increased the risk of Internet addiction (OR = 1.074, 95% CI: 1.011–1.140), significant depression (OR = 1.091, 95% CI: 1.037–1.147), and suicidality (OR = 1.074, 95% CI: 1.014–1.138) at the follow-up assessment. Problem focused and emotion-focus coping at the initial assessment was not significantly associated with the risks of Internet addiction, significant depression, and suicidality at the follow-up assessment. College students who have high PI/EA or are accustomed to using less effective stress coping strategies should be the target of prevention programs for IA (internet addiction), depression, and suicidality.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在一年的随访期间,大学生的心理僵化/体验回避(PI / EA)和压力应对策略对大学生网络成瘾,严重抑郁和自杀的预测效果。共有500名大学生参加了这项研究。最初评估了PI / EA的水平和应对策略。一年后,邀请324名参与者完成Chen互联网成瘾量表,Beck抑郁量表-II和自杀倾向调查表,以评估抑郁症症状以及互联网成瘾和自杀倾向。 PI / EA和压力应对策略的预测效果通过使用控制性别和年龄影响的逻辑回归分析进行了检验。结果表明,PI / EA在初始评估时会增加网络成瘾的风险(OR = 1.087,95%CI:1.042–1.135),严重抑郁(OR = 1.125,95%CI:1.081–1.170)和自杀倾向(在后续评估中,OR = 1.099,95%CI:1.053–1.147)。初次评估时不太有效的应对方法也会增加网络成瘾的风险(OR = 1.074,95%CI:1.011–1.140),严重抑郁症(OR = 1.091,95%CI:1.037–1.147)和自杀倾向(OR = 1.074) ,95%CI:1.014–1.138)。在初始评估中,以问题为中心和以情绪为中心的应对与网络成瘾,严重抑郁和自杀倾向的风险没有显着相关。具有较高PI / EA或习惯于使用不太有效的压力应对策略的大学生应成为IA(网络成瘾),抑郁和自杀的预防计划的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号