首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >18F-FDG-PET uptake in non-infected total hip prostheses
【2h】

18F-FDG-PET uptake in non-infected total hip prostheses

机译:未感染的全髋关节假体摄取18F-FDG-PET

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose — 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can be used in the diagnostic work-up of a patient with suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) but, due to a lack of accurate interpretation criteria, this technique is not routinely applied. Since the physiological uptake pattern of FDG around a joint prosthesis is not fully elucidated, we determined the physiological FDG uptake in non-infected total hip prostheses.Patients and methods — Patients treated with primary total hip arthroplasty (1995–2016) who underwent a FDG-PET/CT for an indication other than a suspected PJI were retrospectively evaluated. Scans were both visually and quantitatively analyzed. Semi-quantitative analysis was performed by calculating maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVpeak) by volume of interests (VOIs) at 8 different locations around the prosthesis.Results — 58 scans from 30 patients were analyzed. In most hips, a diffuse heterogeneous uptake pattern around the prosthesis was observed (in 32/38 of the cemented prostheses, and in 16/20 of the uncemented prostheses) and most uptake was located around the neck of the prosthesis. The median SUVmax in the cemented group was 2.66 (95% CI 2.51–3.10) and in the uncemented group 2.87 (CI 2.65–4.63) (Median difference = –0.36 [CI –1.2 to 0.34]). In uncemented prostheses, there was a positive correlation in time between the age of the prosthesis and the FDG uptake (rs = 0.63 [CI 0.26–0.84]).Interpretation — Our study provides key data to develop accurate interpretation criteria to differentiate between physiological uptake and infection in patients with a prosthetic joint.
机译:背景与目的— 18 F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)可用于疑似假体周围关节感染(PJI)的患者的诊断检查,但由于缺乏准确的解释标准,这种技术不是常规应用。由于尚未完全阐明关节假体周围FDG的生理吸收模式,因此我们确定了非感染性全髋关节假体的FDG生理吸收。患者和方法—接受FDG的初次全髋关节置换术治疗的患者(1995-2016年)回顾性评估了PET / CT对可疑PJI以外的其他适应症。对扫描进行视觉和定量分析。通过在假体周围的8个不同位置计算感兴趣体积(VOI)的最大和峰值标准化摄取值(SUVmax和SUVpeak)来进行半定量分析。结果-分析了30例患者的58次扫描。在大多数髋关节中,观察到假体周围弥漫性异质性吸收模式(在固定假体中占32/38,在未粘结假体中占16/20),大多数吸收位于假体颈部周围。骨水泥组的SUVmax中位数为2.66(95%CI为2.51-3.10),而非骨水泥组的SUVmax为2.87(CI 2.65-4.63)(中位数差异= –0.36 [CI –1.2至0.34])。在无骨水泥假体中,假体年龄与FDG摄取之间存在时间正相关(rs = 0.63 [CI 0.26-0.84])。解释—我们的研究提供了关键数据,以建立准确的解释标准以区分生理摄取假关节患者感染和感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号