首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Teaching skills for accessing and interpreting information from systematic reviews/meta-analyses practice guidelines and the Internet.
【2h】

Teaching skills for accessing and interpreting information from systematic reviews/meta-analyses practice guidelines and the Internet.

机译:用于访问和解释来自系统评价/元分析实践指南和互联网的信息的教学技能。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Skills and practice related to accessing and interpreting clinical information from systematic reviews/meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and the Internet have been integrated into a new senior year elective designed to teach medical students how to critically appraise information from a variety of sources and evaluate it's applicability to patient care. Small groups of senior medical students under the direction of a multidisciplinary team (behavioral scientist, information specialist, physician) facilitate discussions of clinical articles using checklists designed to evaluate their quality. The central feature of the course is a demonstration of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), an electronic journal distributed by BMJ Publishing, and the requirement that students conduct a literature review on a topic of their choice and present an oral and written summary in the form of a "draft" meta-analysis. Students are provided with strategies to "surf" the Internet/WWW for information, e.g., practice guidelines/treatment protocols, descriptions of on-going clinical trials. A total of 52 students have participated to date. Students have selected project topics across a wide range of medical disciplines, including internal medicine, family practice, OB/GYN, pediatrics, surgery, neurology, emergency medicine, and psychiatry. The course is one of the most favorably evaluated of all senior electives and rated more favorably than the overall mean ratings for all electives combined on 8 of 9 scales, including "Quality of course overall" (4.39 vs. 3.92 on 5-point scale).
机译:与通过系统评价/元分析,实践指南和互联网访问和解释临床信息相关的技能和实践已纳入新的高年级选修课,旨在教会医学生如何批判性评估各种来源的信息并进行评估它适用于患者护理。在一个多学科团队的指导下,由小群高级医学生(行为科学家,信息专家,医师)使用旨在评估其质量的清单来促进对临床文章的讨论。该课程的主要特点是对BMJ Publishing发行的电子期刊Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)的演示,并要求学生就自己选择的主题进行文献综述并提供口头和书面摘要以“草稿”荟萃分析的形式呈现。向学生提供了“浏览” Internet / WWW的策略,以获取信息,例如,实践指南/治疗方案,正在进行的临床试验说明。迄今为止,共有52名学生参加了比赛。学生已经选择了广泛医学领域的项目主题,包括内科医学,家庭实践,妇产科,妇产科,儿科,外科,神经病学,急诊医学和精神病学。该课程是所有高级选修课程中最受好评的课程之一,并且比所有选修课程的总平均评分(包括9个等级中的8个)的总体平均评分更有利(包括“整体课程质量”(5分制为4.39比3.92)) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号