首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Shared Decision Making and the Experience of Partnership in Primary Care
【2h】

Shared Decision Making and the Experience of Partnership in Primary Care

机译:共同决策和基层医疗伙伴关系的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Communication has been researched either as a set of behaviors or as a facet of the patient-physician relationship, often leading to conflicting results. To determine the relationship between these perspectives, we examined shared decision making (SDM) and the subjective experience of partnership for patients and physicians in primary care.>METHODS From a convenience sample of experienced primary care physicians in 3 clinics, we recruited a stratified sample of 18 English- or Spanish-speaking patients. Direct observation of visits was followed by videotape-triggered stimulated recall sessions with patients and physicians. We coded decision moments for objective evidence of SDM, using a structured instrument. We classified patients’ and physicians’ subjective experience of partnership as positive or negative by a consensus analysis of stimulated recall sessions. We combined results from these 2 analyses to generate 4 archetypes of engagements and used grounded theory to identify themes associated with each archetype.>RESULTS The 18 visits yielded 125 decisions, 62 (50%) of which demonstrated SDM. Eighty-two decisions were discussed in stimulated recall and available for combined analysis, resulting in 4 archetypes of engagement in decision making: full engagement (SDM present, subjective experience positive)—22%; simulated engagement (SDM present, subjective experience negative)—38%; assumed engagement (SDM absent, subjective experience positive)—21%; and nonengagement (SDM absent, subjective experience negative)—19%. Thematic analysis revealed that both relationship factors (eg, trust, power) and communication behavior influenced subjective experience of partnership.>CONCLUSIONS Combining direct observation and assessment of the subjective experience of partnership suggests that communication behavior does not ensure an experience of collaboration, and a positive subjective experience of partnership does not reflect full communication. Attempts to enhance patient-physician partnership must attend to both effective communication style and affective relationship dynamics.
机译:>目的人们已经研究了交流作为一种行为或作为医患关系的一个方面,通常会导致相互矛盾的结果。为了确定这些观点之间的关系,我们检查了三级诊所中经验丰富的初级保健医生的便利性样本,探讨了初级决策中患者和医生的共享决策(SDM)和伙伴关系的主观经验。>方法 ,我们收集了18名英语或西班牙语患者的分层样本。对访问进行直接观察,然后通过录像带触发与患者和医生的刺激回忆会议。我们使用结构化工具为SDM的客观证据编码了决策时刻。通过对激起的回忆会议进行共识分析,我们将患者和医师的伙伴关系主观经历分为正面还是负面。我们结合了这2种分析的结果,生成了4种参与的原型,并使用了扎根的理论来识别与每种原型相关的主题。>结果。18次访问产生了125个决策,其中62个(50%)证明了SDM。在激起的回忆中讨论了82个决策,并提供了组合分析的结果,从而形成了4种参与决策的原型:完全参与(目前存在SDM,主观经验正面)-22%;模拟参与度(目前存在SDM,主观体验为负面)-38%;假定参与(没有SDM,主观经验正面)-21%;不参与(SDM缺失,主观体验为负面)-19%。主题分析表明,关系因素(例如,信任,权力)和沟通行为都会影响伙伴关系的主观体验。>结论结合对伙伴关系主观体验的直接观察和评估表明,沟通行为并不能确保合作经验和积极的伙伴关系主观经验不能反映出充分的沟通。增强患者与医师之间的伙伴关系的努力必须同时考虑有效的沟通方式和情感关系动态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号