首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Liability Implications of Physician-Directed Care Coordination
【2h】

Liability Implications of Physician-Directed Care Coordination

机译:医师指导的护理协调的责任含义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Various public and private initiatives encourage physicians to coordinate care for patients who have multiple chronic conditions, but physicians may resist doing so for fear of liability. This article assesses the extent of liability risk.>METHODS This qualitative study combines legal research with key informant interviews. Relevant legal authorities were identified through literature searches in legal databases. In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 16 key informants who have relevant expertise in malpractice insurance, risk management, or liability law. Additionally, 19 other participants with relevant experience in case management or managed care were briefly queried about their liability experience relating to care management.>RESULTS Some aspects of care coordination for patients with multiple chronic conditions hold potential for higher liability. Physicians coordinating care have a broader responsibility for patients with complex conditions who have a greater chance of poor outcomes. Care coordinators may be held to a higher standard of care by adopting best practices guidelines or by making medical decisions on issues that require specialized expertise. Other aspects, however, lower liability risk: elderly patients are less likely to sue, care coordination should improve outcomes, and the information systems that support enhanced care coordination target the major sources of medical error in primary care. On balance, the liability risks of care coordination are commensurate with other risks in primary care practice. Liability insurers indicated no reluctance to insure physicians who coordinate care for patients with multiple chronic conditions and no strong tendency to attribute higher risk to this role. Physicians who currently perform these or similar functions have not encountered demonstrably higher liability.>CONCLUSIONS Physicians’ perceptions about the liability risks of coordinating care for patients with multiple chronic conditions do not match evidence about the factors actually driving liability. It appears from many informed sources that there is no strong basis for physicians who perform these functions to have serious concerns about liability; instead, care coordination done well may lower liability risks.
机译:>目的各种公共和私人举措都鼓励医生为患有多种慢性病的患者协调护理,但医生可能会因为担心承担责任而拒绝这样做。本文评估责任风险的程度。>方法该定性研究将法律研究与关键知情人访谈相结合。通过在法律数据库中进行文献检索来确定相关的法律权威。进行了有针对性的16位主要举报人的访谈,这些举报人在医疗事故保险,风险管理或责任法方面具有相关专业知识。此外,还简要询问了其他19位在病例管理或管理式护理方面具有相关经验的参与者关于其与护理管理相关的责任经验。>结果对患有多种慢性病患者的护理协调的某些方面具有更高的责任感。对于病情复杂,预后差的可能性更大的患者,协调医疗的医生应承担更大的责任。通过采用最佳实践准则或对需要专门知识的问题做出医疗决定,可以使护理协调员获得更高的护理标准。但是,其他方面的责任风险较低:老年患者提起诉讼的可能性较小,护理协调应改善结果,支持加强护理协调的信息系统将主要医疗错误的主要来源作为目标。总体而言,护理协调的责任风险与初级保健实践中的其他风险是相称的。责任保险公司表示,不愿意向为多种慢性病患者提供协调治疗的医生保险,也没有强烈的倾向将这种风险归因于此。当前执行这些或类似功能的内科医师并没有遇到明显更高的责任。>结论内科医师对多种慢性病患者协调治疗的责任风险的看法与导致实际责任的因素的证据不符。从许多知情的人士看来,履行这些职能的医生没有充分的依据来担心责任问题。相反,做好护理协调可以降低责任风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号