首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >Single site multiport umbilical laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy in acute settings
【2h】

Single site multiport umbilical laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy in acute settings

机译:在急性环境中单部位多端口腹腔镜阑尾切除术与常规多端口腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionAlthough conventional multiport laparoscopic appendicectomy (CMLA) is preferred for managing acute appendicitis, the recently developed transumbilical laparoscopic approach is rapidly gaining popularity. However, its wide dissemination seems restricted by technical/technological issues. In this regard, a newly developed method of single site multiport umbilical laparoscopic appendicectomy (SMULA) was compared prospectively with CMLA to assess the former’s efficacy and the technical advantages in acute scenarios.
机译:简介尽管常规的多端口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CMLA)在治疗急性阑尾炎方面是首选,但最近开发的经脐带腹腔镜手术正迅速普及。但是,其广泛传播似乎受到技术/技术问题的限制。在这方面,前瞻性地将一种新开发的单部位多端口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SMULA)与CMLA进行了比较,以评估前者在急性情况下的疗效和技术优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号