首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK.
【2h】

A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK.

机译:在英国对急性胆源性胰腺炎和急性胆囊炎患者进行胆石症的手术时机和方法的调查。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recent management guidelines and randomised clinical trials have provided evidence-based guidance to the management of acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 1086 members of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. There were 583 responders (54%). RESULTS: A policy of cholecystectomy during the index admission or within 4 weeks in fit patients recovering from mild acute biliary pancreatitis was adopted by 58% of surgeons, and was significantly associated with an upper gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary subspecialty interest and a volume of more than 50 cholecystectomies per annum (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.72; P = 0.001: and OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.74; P = 0.001, respectively). A policy of urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was adopted by 20% of surgeons, and was significantly associated with an upper gastrointestinal/hepato-pancreato-biliary subspecialty interest and the 'routine' adoption of laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.60; P < 0.001: and OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.3-0.86; P = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis in the UK remains suboptimal. Moreover, only a minority of surgeons offer patients presenting with acute cholecystitis the benefits of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The management of acute biliary disease may be improved if these cases were concentrated in the hands of surgeons with upper gastrointestinal/hepato-pancreato-biliary interest and those who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy regularly.
机译:背景:最近的治疗指南和随机临床试验为急性胆源性胰腺炎和急性胆囊炎的治疗提供了循证指导。方法:向英国和爱尔兰外科医生协会的1086名成员发送了问卷。有583位回应者(54%)。结果:58%的外科医师在索引入院期间或在4周内对从轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎中恢复的健康患者进行了胆囊切除术,这与上消化道和肝胰胆道亚专科的兴趣和数量显着相关每年超过50个胆囊切除术(OR,0.43; 95%CI,0.26-0.72; P = 0.001:和OR,0.46; 95%CI,0.29-0.74; P = 0.001)。 20%的外科医师采用了针对急性胆囊炎的紧急胆囊切除术政策,并且与上消化道/肝胰胰胆亚专科的兴趣以及腹腔镜方法胆囊切除术的“常规”采用显着相关(OR,0.34; 95% CI为0.19-0.60; P <0.001:OR为0.51; 95%CI为0.3-0.86; P = 0.01)。结论:在英国急性胆源性胰腺炎患者中胆石症的治疗仍欠佳。而且,只有少数外科医生为患有急性胆囊炎的患者提供早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的益处。如果这些病例集中在有上消化道/肝胰胆管疾病的外科医生以及定期进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的医生手中,则可以改善急性胆道疾病的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号