首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >An Analysis of Distance from Collision Site to Pedestrian Residence in Pedestrian versus Automobile Collisions Presenting to a Level 1 Trauma Center
【2h】

An Analysis of Distance from Collision Site to Pedestrian Residence in Pedestrian versus Automobile Collisions Presenting to a Level 1 Trauma Center

机译:行人与汽车碰撞到一级创伤中心的碰撞地点到行人居住区的距离分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study tests the hypothesis that most pedestrian collisions occur near victims’ homes. Patients involved in automobile versus pedestrian collisions who presented to the emergency department at a Level I trauma center between January 2000 and December 2009 were included in the study. Patient demographics were obtained from the trauma registry. Home address was determined from hospital records, collision site was determined from the paramedic run sheet, and the shortest walking distance between the collision site and pedestrian residence was determined using Google Maps. We summarized distances for groups with the median and compared groups using the Kruskal-Wallis rank test. We identified 1917 pedestrian injury cases and identified both residence address and collision location for 1213 cases (63%). Forty-eight percent of the collisions were near home (within 1.1 km, 95% CI 45–51%). Median distance from residence to collision site was 1.4 km (interquartile range 0.3–7.4 km). For ages 0–17, the median distance 0.7 km, and 59% (95% CI 54–63%) of collisions occurred near home. For ages 65 and older, the median distance was 0.6 km and 65% (95% CI 55–73%) were injured near home. Distance did not differ by sex, race, ethnicity, or blood alcohol level. More severe injuries (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16) occurred further from home than less severe injuries (median 1.9 km vs. 1.3 km, p=.01). Patients with a hospital stay of 3 days or less were injured closer to home (median 1.3 km) than patients with a hospital stay of 4 days or more (median 1.8 km, p=.001). Twenty-two percent were injured within the same census tract as their home, 22% on the boundary of their home census tract, and 55% in a different census tract.
机译:这项研究检验了以下假设:大多数行人碰撞发生在受害者的家附近。该研究纳入了2000年1月至2009年12月之间在一级创伤中心急诊科就诊的汽车与行人碰撞患者。从创伤登记处获得患者的人口统计信息。根据医院记录确定家庭住址,根据护理人员运行记录确定碰撞地点,并使用Google Maps确定碰撞地点与行人住所之间的最短步行距离。我们用中位值汇总了各组的距离,并使用Kruskal-Wallis等级检验比较了各组。我们确定了1917例行人受伤案件,并确定了1213例(63%)的住所和撞车地点。百分之四十八的碰撞是在离家很近的地方(在1.1公里范围内,95%的CI为45-51%)。从住宅到碰撞地点的中位距离为1.4公里(四分位间距为0.3-7.4公里)。对于0-17岁,平均距离为0.7 km,59%(95%CI 54-63%)的碰撞发生在房屋附近。对于65岁及65岁以上的人群,中位距离为0.6公里,附近房屋受伤的比例为65%(95%CI 55-73%)。距离不受性别,种族,种族或血液酒精含量的影响。离家较远的地方发生的伤害更大(伤害严重性得分≥16),而不是伤害程度更轻的伤害(中位数1.9 km和1.3 km,p = .01)。住院时间为3天或更短的患者比住院时间为4天或更长时间(中值为1.8 km,p = .001)的患者离家更近(中位1.3 km)。 22%的人在与自己家相同的人口普查区受伤,22%在其家庭普查区边界受伤,而55%在其他人口普查区受伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号