首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Translational Medicine >Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality
【2h】

Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality

机译:内镜黏膜下剥离的十项质量指标:应监测和报告以改善质量的指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the last decade, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become more popular in Asia and, more recently, also in Europe and North America, however the issue of quality control has never been raised. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify possible quality indicators to monitor as part of internal audit process. This is particularly compelling, since the diffusion of ESD outside Asian, super-expert, high-volume, tertiary referral centers. In the current review, we raised the issue of quality control for ESD and proposed a list of ten possible quality indicators that should be monitored by each endoscopist and reported in every study reporting results on ESD procedures. We feel that these quality indicators should be used in clinical practice by endoscopists to benchmark the data with the internationally recommended standards.
机译:在过去的十年中,内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)在亚洲以及最近在欧洲和北美也变得越来越普遍,但是从未提出过质量控制的问题。因此,迫切需要确定可能的质量指标,以作为内部审核流程的一部分进行监控。这尤其令人信服,因为ESD在亚洲,超级专家,大批量,三级转诊中心以外的地区扩散。在当前的审查中,我们提出了ESD的质量控制问题,并提出了十种可能的质量指标清单,这些指标应由每个内镜医师进行监测,并在每项有关ESD程序的研究结果中进行报告。我们认为,内镜医师应在临床实践中使用这些质量指标,以符合国际推荐标准的数据为基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号