首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antibiotics >Something Borrowed Something New: A Governance and Social Construction Framework to Investigate Power Relations and Responses of Diverse Stakeholders to Policies Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance
【2h】

Something Borrowed Something New: A Governance and Social Construction Framework to Investigate Power Relations and Responses of Diverse Stakeholders to Policies Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance

机译:借来的东西新的东西:治理和社会建设框架研究权力关系和不同利益相关者对解决抗菌素耐药性的政策的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has rapidly ascended the political agenda in numerous high-income countries, developing effective and sustainable policy responses in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is far from straightforward, as AMR could be described as a classic ‘wicked problem’. Effective policy responses to combat AMR in LMIC will require a deeper knowledge of the policy process and its actors at all levels—global, regional and national—and their motivations for supporting or opposing policies to combat AMR. The influence of personal interests and connections between for-profit organisations—such as pharmaceutical companies and food producers—and policy actors in these settings is complex and very rarely addressed. In this paper, the authors describe the role of policy analysis focusing on social constructions, governance and power relations in soliciting a better understanding of support and opposition by key stakeholders for alternative AMR mitigation policies. Owing to the lack of conceptual frameworks on the policy process addressing AMR, we propose an approach to researching policy processes relating to AMR currently tested through our empirical programme of research in Cambodia, Pakistan, Indonesia and Tanzania. This new conceptualisation is based on theories of governance and a social construction framework and describes how the framework is being operationalised in several settings.
机译:虽然抗微生物药耐药性(AMR)在许多高收入国家中迅速提升了政治议程,但在中低收入国家(LMIC)中制定有效且可持续的政策对策并非易事,因为AMR可以说是经典的“邪恶的问题”。要有效地应对中低收入国家的抗菌药物耐药性,需要对政策进程及其在全球,区域和国家各级的行动者有更深入的了解,以及他们支持或反对抗菌药物耐药性的政策动机。在这些情况下,个人利益以及以营利为目的的组织(例如制药公司和食品生产商)与政策制定者之间的联系的影响是复杂的,很少涉及。在本文中,作者描述了侧重于社会建设,治理和权力关系的政策分析在促使人们更好地理解主要利益相关者对替代性AMR缓解政策的支持和反对中的作用。由于缺乏针对AMR的政策流程的概念框架,我们提出了一种方法来研究与AMR相关的政策流程,该方法目前通过我们在柬埔寨,巴基斯坦,印度尼西亚和坦桑尼亚的实证研究计划进行了测试。这种新的概念化基于治理理论和社会构建框架,并描述了该框架如何在多种环境中运行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号