首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Effects of teicoplanin and those of vancomycin in initial empirical antibiotic regimen for febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Gimema Infection Program.
【2h】

Effects of teicoplanin and those of vancomycin in initial empirical antibiotic regimen for febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. Gimema Infection Program.

机译:替考拉宁和万古霉素对发热中性粒细胞减少性血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的初步经验性抗生素治疗的效果。 Gimema感染程序。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The efficacy and toxicity of teicoplanin and vancomycin in the initial empirical antibiotic regimen in febrile, neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies were compared in a prospective, randomized, unblinded, multicenter trial in the setting of 29 hematologic units in tertiary-care or university hospitals. A total of 635 consecutive febrile patients with hematologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive intravenously amikacin plus ceftazidime plus either teicoplanin at 6 mg/kg of body weight once daily or vancomycin at 1 g twice daily. An efficacy analysis was done for 527 evaluable patients: 275 treated with teicoplanin and 252 treated with vancomycin. Overall, successful outcomes were recorded for 78% of patients who received teicoplanin and 75% of those who were randomized to vancomycin (difference, 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10 to 4%; P = 0.33). A total of 102 patients presented with primary, single-agent, gram-positive bacteremia. Coagulase-negative staphylococci accounted for 42%, Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 27%, and streptococci accounted for 21% of all gram-positive blood isolates. The overall responses to therapy of gram-positive bacteremias were 92 and 87% for teicoplanin and vancomycin, respectively (difference, 5%; CI, -17 to 6%; P = 0.22). Side effects, mainly represented by skin rash, occurred in 3.2 and 8% of teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -4.8%; CI, 0.7 to 8%; P = 0.03); the rate of nephrotoxicity was 1.4 and 0.8% for the teicoplanin and vancomycin groups, respectively (difference, 0.6%; CI, -2 to 1%; P = 0.68). Further infections were caused by gram-positive organisms in two patients (0.7%) treated with teicoplanin and one patient (0.4%) who received vancomycin (difference, 0.3%; CI, -0.9 to 1.0%; P = 0.53). Overall mortalities were 8.5 and 11% for teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated patients, respectively (difference, -2.5%; CI, - 2 to 7%; P = 0.43); death was caused by primary gram-positive infections in three patients (1%) in each treatment group. When used for initial empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile, neutropenic patients, teicoplanin was at least as efficacious as vancomycin, but it was associated with fewer side effects.
机译:在前瞻性,随机,无盲,多中心试验中,在三级护理或大学医院的29个血液病学单位中,比较了替考拉宁和万古霉素在高热,中性粒细胞减少性血液系统恶性肿瘤患者最初的经验性抗生素治疗方案中的疗效和毒性。总共635名连续的发热性恶性血液病和化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少的发热患者被随机分配接受静脉注射阿米卡星联合头孢他啶加替考拉宁,每日一次6 mg / kg体重,或万古霉素,每天1 g,两次。对527例可评估的患者进行了疗效分析:275例替考拉宁治疗,252例万古霉素治疗。总体而言,记录了78%接受替考拉宁治疗的患者和75%接受万古霉素治疗的患者的成功结局(差异3%; 95%置信区间[CI] -10至4%; P = 0.33)。共有102例患者出现原发性单药革兰氏阳性菌血症。在所有革兰氏阳性血液分离物中,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌占42%,金黄色葡萄球菌占27%,链球菌占21%。替考拉宁和万古霉素对革兰氏阳性菌血症治疗的总体反应分别为92%和87%(差异为5%; CI为-17至6%; P = 0.22)。替考拉宁和万古霉素治疗的患者分别发生副作用的发生率分别为3.2%和8%(差异为-4.8%; CI为0.7至8%; P = 0.03)。替考拉宁组和万古霉素组的肾毒性发生率分别为1.4%和0.8%(差异为0.6%; CI为-2至1%; P = 0.68)。接受替考拉宁治疗的两名患者(0.7%)和接受万古霉素的一名患者(0.4%)由革兰氏阳性菌引起进一步感染(差异为0.3%; CI为-0.9至1.0%; P = 0.53)。经替考拉宁和万古霉素治疗的患者的总死亡率分别为8.5和11%(差异为-2.5%; CI为2至7%; P = 0.43);死亡是由每个治疗组中三名患者(1%)的原发性革兰氏阳性感染引起的。当用于发热,中性粒细胞减少的患者的初步经验性抗生素治疗时,替考拉宁至少与万古霉素一样有效,但副作用较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号