首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied Psychological Measurement >A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing
【2h】

A Comparison of Constrained Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing

机译:多维计算机自适应测试中约束项目选择方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The construction of assessments in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) usually involves fulfilling a large number of statistical and non-statistical constraints to meet test specifications. To improve measurement precision and test validity, the multidimensional priority index (MPI) and the modified MPI (MMPI) can be used to monitor many constraints simultaneously under a between-item and a within-item multidimensional framework, respectively. As both item selection methods can be implemented easily and computed efficiently, they are important and useful for operational CATs; however, no thorough simulation study has compared the performance of these two item selection methods under two different item bank structures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency of the MMPI and the MPI item selection methods under the between-item and within-item multidimensional CAT through simulations. The MMPI and the MPI item selection methods yielded similar performance in measurement precision for both multidimensional pools and yielded similar performance in exposure control and constraint management for the between-item multidimensional pool. For the within-item multidimensional pool, the MPI method yielded slightly better performance in exposure control but yielded slightly worse performance in constraint management than the MMPI method.
机译:在计算机自​​适应测试(CAT)中评估的构建通常涉及满足大量统计和非统计约束,以满足测试规范。为了提高测量精度和测试有效性,多维优先级索引(MPI)和改进的MPI(MMPI)可以分别在项目间和项目内多维框架下同时监视许多约束。由于两种项目选择方法都可以轻松实施和高效计算,因此对于运营的CAT来说非常重要和有用;但是,没有彻底的模拟研究可以比较这两种项目选择方法在两种不同的项目库结构下的性能。这项研究的目的是通过仿真研究在项目间和项目内多维CAT下MMPI的效率和MPI项目选择方法。 MMPI和MPI项目选择方法在两个多维池的测量精度上均表现出相似的性能,而在项目间多维池的曝光控制和约束管理方面,则表现出相似的性能。对于项目内部多维池,与MMPI方法相比,MPI方法在曝光控制方面产生的性能稍好,但在约束管理方面产生的性能稍差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号