首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >Intermittent low-dose antiandrogen monotherapy as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
【2h】

Intermittent low-dose antiandrogen monotherapy as an alternative therapeutic option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy

机译:间歇性小剂量抗雄激素单药治疗是前列腺癌根治术后手术切缘阳性的患者的替代治疗选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to determine whether oncologic outcomes and adverse events associated with active on/off intermittent antiandrogen monotherapy (daily bicalutamide, 50 mg per day) are comparable with those of standard external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy in prostate cancers with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Two hundred twenty-three patients with positive surgical margins post-radical prostatectomy who underwent active surveillance (AS, n = 32), EBRT without hormone therapy (n = 55), intermittent antiandrogen monotherapy without EBRT (IAAM, n = 50), or CAB without EBRT (n = 86), between 2007 and 2014, were reviewed retrospectively. Pathologic outcomes, biochemical recurrence rates, radiological disease progression, and adverse events were collected from medical records. Biochemical recurrence rates, biochemical recurrence-free survival rates, and radiological recurrence were not different between the groups (P = 0.225, 0.896, and 0.284, respectively). Adverse event rates and severities were lower for IAAM compared with EBRT or CAB (both P < 0.05), but were comparable to those for AS (P = 0.591 and 0.990, respectively). Grade ≥3 adverse events were not reported in the IAAM or AS groups. Erectile dysfunction and loss of libido rates were lower in the IAAM group compared with the EBRT and CAB groups (P = 0.032). Gastrointestinal complications were more frequently reported in the EBRT group (P = 0.008). Active on/off IAAM treatment might be an appropriate treatment option for patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, regarding oncologic outcomes, IAAM was comparable to standard EBRT but had a milder adverse event profile.
机译:本研究的目的是确定与有效的开/关间歇性抗雄激素单一疗法(每日比卡鲁胺,每天50 mg)相关的肿瘤学结果和不良事件是否与标准外照射疗法(EBRT)或联合雄激素阻断疗法相当(CAB)治疗在前列腺癌根治性手术后的手术切缘阳性的前列腺癌中。 233例前列腺癌根治术后手术切缘阳性的患者接受了主动监测(AS,n = 32),无激素治疗的EBRT(n = 55),无EBRT的间歇性抗雄激素单药治疗(IAAM,n = 50),或回顾性分析了2007年至2014年间无EBRT的CAB(n = 86)。从病历中收集病理结果,生化复发率,放射疾病进展和不良事件。两组之间的生化复发率,无生化复发生存率和放射学复发无差异(分别为P = 0.225、0.896和0.284)。与EBRT或CAB相比,IAAM的不良事件发生率和严重程度较低(均为P <0.05),但与AS的不良事件发生率和严重程度相当(分别为P = 0.591和0.990)。 IAAM或AS组未报告≥3级不良事件。与EBRT和CAB组相比,IAAM组的勃起功能障碍和性欲降低率较低(P = 0.032)。 EBRT组胃肠道并发症的发生率更高(P = 0.008)。对于前列腺癌根治术后手术切缘阳性的患者,积极的开/关IAAM治疗可能是合适的治疗选择。此外,就肿瘤学结局而言,IAAM与标准EBRT相当,但不良事件较轻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号