首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >A meta-regression evaluating the effectiveness and prognostic factors of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction
【2h】

A meta-regression evaluating the effectiveness and prognostic factors of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

机译:荟萃回归评估口服磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂治疗勃起功能障碍的有效性和预后因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) for erectile dysfunction (ED) varies considerably among trials, but available studies investigating the factors that affect the effectiveness are few and findings are not consistent. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PDE5-Is with placebo for the treatment of ED. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. The associations between prespecified study-level factors and effectiveness were tested by a random effects meta-regression model. This study included 93 trials with 26 139 patients. When all PDE5-Is were grouped together, Caucasian ethnicity was associated with 15.636% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.858% to 32.579%) increase in risk ratio (RR) for Global Assessment Questionnaire question-1 (GAQ-1), and 1.473 (95% CI: 0.406 to 2.338) score increase in mean difference (MD) for posttreatment International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score (IIEF-EF), compared to Asian ethnicity. A one-score increase in baseline IIEF-EF was associated with −5.635% (95% CI: −9.120% to −2.017%) reduction in RR for GAQ-1, and −0.229 (95% CI: −0.425 to −0.042) score decrease in MD for posttreatment IIEF-EF. In conclusion, PDE5-Is are more effective in Caucasians than Asians, and in patients with more severe ED.
机译:在各试验中,磷酸二酯酶5型抑制剂(PDE5-Is)对勃起功能障碍(ED)的有效性差异很大,但是有关影响有效性的因素的现有研究很少,结果也不一致。在PubMed,Cochrane Library和EMBASE中进行了系统的搜索,以鉴定比较PDE5-Is与安慰剂治疗ED的随机对照试验。纳入研究的方法学质量由Cochrane Collaboration评估偏倚风险的工具评估。预先设定的研究水平因素与有效性之间的关联通过随机效应荟萃回归模型进行了检验。该研究包括93项试验,共26 139例患者。当将所有PDE5-I分组在一起时,全球评估问卷第1题(GAQ-1)的风险比(RR)上升15.636%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.858%至32.579%),这与白人种族相关。 ,与亚洲人相比,治疗后国际勃起功能指数-勃起功能域评分(IIEF-EF)的平均差(MD)得分提高了1.473(95%CI:0.406至2.338)。 GAQ-1的基线IIEF-EF升高1分与RR降低-5.635%(95%CI:-9.120%至-2.017%)和-0.229(95%CI:-0.425至-0.042 )治疗后IIEF-EF的MD得分降低。总之,PDE5-Is在白种人中比在亚洲人中更有效,在患有更严重ED的患者中也更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号