首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Oncology >Development and Validation of the Dietary Habits and Colon Cancer Beliefs Survey (DHCCBS): An Instrument Assessing Health Beliefs Related to Red Meat and Green Leafy Vegetable Consumption
【2h】

Development and Validation of the Dietary Habits and Colon Cancer Beliefs Survey (DHCCBS): An Instrument Assessing Health Beliefs Related to Red Meat and Green Leafy Vegetable Consumption

机译:饮食习惯和结肠癌信念调查(DHCCBS​​)的发展和验证:一种评估与红肉和绿叶蔬菜消费有关的健康信念的工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dietary patterns characterized by higher red meat (RM) consumption are associated with increased colon cancer (CC) risk. Preclinical and epidemiological evidence suggest higher green leafy vegetable (GLV) consumption may mitigate these risks. Determining the relationship between dietary habits and expected health outcomes is needed. Methods. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used to assess perceived CC susceptibility and severity, and related dietary benefits, barriers, and motivators. RM and GLV consumption were quantified using select DHQII items (n=15) capturing the previous 30 days' intake. A 34-item Qualtrics survey was provided to a convenience sample of 1,075 adults residing throughout the US Confirmatory factor analysis measured fitness with HBM, and Cronbach's alpha assessed subscale reliability. A subsample (n=47) completed a 2-week follow-up for test-retest reliability. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare RM and GLV intake and DHCCBS responses between genders. Individual barrier questions and RM and GLV consumption were compared using ANOVA for each gender; post hoc analyses between barrier question responses were assessed with Bonferroni correction. Results were considered significant with a p value of less than 0.05. Results. 990 US adults (52.7% female, 79.1% white, 50.8% aged 35+ years) completed valid surveys. Factor analysis with varimax rotation validated the construct of HBM subscales; only one question had a loading less than 0.745. Subscale Cronbach's alphas ranged within 0.478-0.845. Overall test-retest reliability was acceptable (r=0.697, p=5.22x10−8). Participant BMI was (mean±SD) 26.7±6.6 kg/m2. Participants consumed (median, IQR) 2.3, 0.9-4.7 cooked cup equivalents GLV/week and 12.2, 5.8-21.5 ounces RM/week. Over half of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I can't imagine never eating red meat,” while less than one eighth of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I don't like the taste of green leafy vegetables.” Conclusion. The DHCCBS is a valid instrument for measuring health beliefs related to red meat, green leafy vegetables, and perceived colon cancer risk. Additionally, these findings suggest increasing GLV may be more feasible than reducing RM for CC risk reduction in meat eaters.
机译:以较高的红肉(RM)消耗为特征的饮食模式与结肠癌(CC)风险增加相关。临床前和流行病学证据表明,较高的绿叶蔬菜(GLV)消费量可以减轻这些风险。需要确定饮食习惯与预期健康结果之间的关系。方法。健康信念模型(HBM)用于评估感知的CC敏感性和严重性以及相关的饮食益处,障碍和动机。 RM和GLV消耗量通过选择DHQII项(n = 15)来量化,记录了前30天的摄入量。一项针对34个项目的Qualtrics调查提供给整个美国的1,075名成年人的便利性样本。验证性因素分析测量了HBM的适应性,Cronbach's alpha评估了子量表的信度。子样本(n = 47)完成了为期2周的随访,以进行重测信度。使用独立样本t检验比较性别之间的RM和GLV摄入量以及DHCCBS​​反应。使用ANOVA比较每个性别的个体障碍问题以及RM和GLV消费;使用Bonferroni校正评估障碍问题回答之间的事后分析。结果被认为是显着的,p值小于0.05。结果。 990位美国成年人(女性52.7%,白人79.1%,35.35岁以上年龄的50.8%)完成了有效调查。方差最大旋转的因子分析验证了HBM分量表的构建;只有一个问题的负载小于0.745。子规模Cronbach的alpha值在0.478-0.845之间。总体重测信度是可以接受的(r = 0.697,p = 5.22x10 -8 )。参与者的BMI为(平均值±标准偏差)26.7±6.6 kg / m 2 。参与者消耗(中位数,IQR)2.3、0.9-4.7煮杯当量GLV /周和12.2、5.8-21.5盎司RM /周。超过一半的受访者同意或强烈同意“我无法想象永远不吃红肉”这一说法,而不到八分之一的受访者同意或强烈同意“我不喜欢绿叶蔬菜的味道”这一说法。 ”结论。 DHCCBS​​是衡量与红肉,绿叶蔬菜和结肠癌风险相关的健康观念的有效工具。此外,这些发现表明,增加GLV可能比减少RM减少肉食者CC风险更可行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号