首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioinformation >Building gene co-expression networks using transcriptomics data for systems biology investigations: Comparison of methods using microarray data
【2h】

Building gene co-expression networks using transcriptomics data for systems biology investigations: Comparison of methods using microarray data

机译:使用转录组学数据构建基因共表达网络以进行系统生物学研究:使用微阵列数据的方法比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gene co-expression networks (GCN), built using high-throughput gene expression data are fundamental aspects of systems biology. The main aims of this study were to compare two popular approaches to building and analysing GCN. We use real ovine microarray transcriptomics datasets representing four different treatments with Metyrapone, an inhibitor of cortisol biosynthesis. We conducted several microarray quality control checks before applying GCN methods to filtered datasets. Then we compared the outputs of two methods using connectivity as a criterion, as it measures how well a node (gene) is connected within a network. The two GCN construction methods used were, Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and Partial Correlation and Information Theory (PCIT) methods. Nodes were ranked based on their connectivity measures in each of the four different networks created by WGCNA and PCIT and node ranks in two methods were compared to identify those nodes which are highly differentially ranked (HDR). A total of 1,017 HDR nodes were identified across one or more of four networks. We investigated HDR nodes by gene enrichment analyses in relation to their biological relevance to phenotypes. We observed that, in contrast to WGCNA method, PCIT algorithm removes many of the edges of the most highly interconnected nodes. Removal of edges of most highly connected nodes or hub genes will have consequences for downstream analyses and biological interpretations. In general, for large GCN construction (with > 20000 genes) access to large computer clusters, particularly those with larger amounts of shared memory is recommended.
机译:使用高通量基因表达数据构建的基因共表达网络(GCN)是系统生物学的基本方面。这项研究的主要目的是比较两种流行的方法来构建和分析GCN。我们使用真实的绵羊微阵列转录组学数据集,代表用皮质醇生物合成抑制剂美替拉酮的四种不同治疗方法。在将GCN方法应用于过滤后的数据集之前,我们进行了一些微阵列质量控制检查。然后,我们比较了以连通性为标准的两种方法的输出,因为它可以衡量节点(基因)在网络中的连接程度。所使用的两种GCN构建方法是加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)和偏相关和信息论(PCIT)方法。根据由WGCNA和PCIT创建的四个不同网络中每个节点的连接性度量对节点进行排名,并比较两种方法中的节点排名,以识别高差分排名(HDR)的那些节点。在四个网络中的一个或多个中,总共确定了1,017个HDR节点。我们通过基因富集分析调查了HDR节点与它们与表型的生物学相关性。我们观察到,与WGCNA方法相比,PCIT算法去除了高度互连的节点的许多边缘。去除高度连接的节点或集线器基因的边缘将对下游分析和生物学解释产生影响。通常,对于大型GCN构建(具有> 20000个基因),建议访问大型计算机群集,尤其是那些具有大量共享内存的计算机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号