首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands
【2h】

Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands

机译:两种产妇护理模式在疼痛缓解中的疼痛接受和个人控制:比利时和荷兰的跨国比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundA cross-national comparison of Belgian and Dutch childbearing women allows us to gain insight into the relative importance of pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in 2 maternity care models. Although Belgium and the Netherlands are neighbouring countries sharing the same language, political system and geography, they are characterised by a different organisation of health care, particularly in maternity care. In Belgium the medical risks of childbirth are emphasised but neutralised by a strong belief in the merits of the medical model. Labour pain is perceived as a needless inconvenience easily resolved by means of pain medication. In the Netherlands the midwifery model of care defines childbirth as a normal physiological process and family event. Labour pain is perceived as an ally in the birth process.
机译:背景比利时和荷兰育龄妇女的跨国比较使我们能够洞悉两种产妇护理模式中疼痛接受和个人控制对缓解疼痛的相对重要性。尽管比利时和荷兰是拥有相同语言,政治制度和地理区域的邻国,但它们的特点是卫生保健的组织不同,尤其是在产妇保健方面。在比利时,人们强调了分娩的医疗风险,但坚决相信这种医疗模式的优点可以消除这种风险。劳动痛被认为是通过镇痛药物容易解决的不必要的麻烦。在荷兰,助产士护理模式将分娩定义为正常的生理过程和家庭事件。劳动痛被认为是分娩过程中的盟友。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号