首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medicine >E-cigarettes: methodological and ideological issues and research priorities
【2h】

E-cigarettes: methodological and ideological issues and research priorities

机译:电子烟:方法论和意识形态问题以及研究重点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cigarette combustion, rather than either tobacco or nicotine, is the cause of a public health disaster. Fortunately, several new technologies that vaporize nicotine or tobacco, and may make cigarettes obsolete, have recently appeared. Research priorities include the effects of vaporizers on smoking cessation and initiation, their safety and toxicity, use by non-smokers, dual use of vaporizers and cigarettes, passive vaping, renormalization of smoking, and the development of messages that effectively communicate the continuum of risk for tobacco and nicotine products. A major difficulty is that we are chasing a moving target. New products constantly appear, and research results are often obsolete by the time they are published. Vaporizers do not need to be safe, only safer than cigarettes. However, harm reduction principles are often misunderstood or rejected. In the context of a fierce ideological debate, and major investments by the tobacco industry, it is crucial that independent researchers provide regulators and the public with evidence-based guidance. The methodological and ideological hurdles on this path are discussed in this commentary.
机译:卷烟燃烧而不是烟草或尼古丁燃烧是造成公共卫生灾难的原因。幸运的是,最近出现了几种蒸发尼古丁或烟草并可能使香烟过时的新技术。研究重点包括汽化器对戒烟和起烟的影响,其安全性和毒性,非吸烟者使用,汽化器和香烟的双重使用,被动吸烟,使吸烟重新正常化以及开发有效传达风险连续性的信息用于烟草和尼古丁产品。一个主要的困难是我们正在追求一个移动的目标。新产品不断出现,研究成果在发布时往往已经过时。蒸发器不需要安全,仅比香烟更安全。但是,减少伤害原则常常被误解或拒绝。在激烈的意识形态辩论和烟草业的大量投资的背景下,至关重要的是,独立研究人员应向监管者和公众提供基于证据的指导。在这篇评论中讨论了在这条道路上的方法和思想上的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号