首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Psychiatry >Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study)
【2h】

Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study)

机译:一项比较实用的锂和喹硫平治疗难治性抑郁症的临床和成本效益的随机实用试验研究方案(LQD研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundApproximately 30–50% of patients with major depressive disorder can be classed as treatment resistant, widely defined as a failure to respond to two or more adequate trials of antidepressants in the current episode. Treatment resistant depression is associated with a poorer prognosis and higher mortality rates. One treatment option is to augment an existing antidepressant with a second agent. Lithium and the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine are two such add-on therapies and are currently recommended as first line options for treatment resistant depression. However, whilst neither treatment has been established as superior to the other in short-term studies, they have yet to be compared head-to-head in longer term studies, or with a superiority design in this patient group.
机译:背景大约30–50%的重度抑郁症患者可归类为治疗抗药性,广泛定义为对当前发作中的两项或更多项抗抑郁药试验没有反应。抗药性抑郁与预后较差和死亡率较高有关。一种治疗选择是用第二种药物增强现有的抗抑郁药。锂和非典型抗精神病药物喹硫平是两种这样的附加疗法,目前被推荐作为治疗耐药性抑郁症的首选药物。然而,尽管在短期研究中没有一种方法被确立为优于其他方法,但在长期研究中或在该患者组中采用优势设计时,尚没有将它们进行正面对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号