首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Public Health >Do outcomes differ between work and non-work-related injury in a universal injury compensation system? Findings from the New Zealand Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study
【2h】

Do outcomes differ between work and non-work-related injury in a universal injury compensation system? Findings from the New Zealand Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study

机译:在通用伤害赔偿系统中工伤和非工伤之间的结局是否有所不同?新西兰伤害研究预期结果的发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPoorer recovery outcomes for workers injured in a work setting, as opposed to a non-work setting, are commonly attributed to differences in financial gain via entitlement to compensation by injury setting (ie. workers compensation schemes). To date, this attribution hasn’t been tested in a situation where both work and non-work-related injuries have an equivalent entitlement to compensation. This study tests the hypothesis that there will be no differences in recovery outcomes for workers by injury setting (work and non-work) within a single universal entitlement injury compensation scheme.
机译:背景技术与非工作环境相比,在工作环境中受伤的工人的较差恢复结果通常归因于通过享受伤害情况补偿(即,工人补偿计划)而获得的经济收益差异。迄今为止,这种归因还没有在工伤和非工伤都享有同等赔偿权利的情况下进行检验。这项研究检验了以下假设:在一个普遍应享伤害赔偿计划中,通过伤害设定(工作和非工作),工人的恢复结果将没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号