首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Ecology >To have your citizen science cake and eat it? Delivering research and outreach through Open Air Laboratories (OPAL)
【2h】

To have your citizen science cake and eat it? Delivering research and outreach through Open Air Laboratories (OPAL)

机译:要吃你的公民科学蛋糕吗?通过露天实验室(OPAL)进行研究和推广

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe vast array of citizen science projects which have blossomed over the last decade span a spectrum of objectives from research to outreach. While some focus primarily on the collection of rigorous scientific data and others are positioned towards the public engagement end of the gradient, the majority of initiatives attempt to balance the two. Although meeting multiple aims can be seen as a ‘win–win’ situation, it can also yield significant challenges as allocating resources to one element means that they may be diverted away from the other. Here we analyse one such programme which set out to find an effective equilibrium between these arguably polarised goals. Through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme we explore the inherent trade-offs encountered under four indicators derived from an independent citizen science evaluation framework. Assimilating experience from the OPAL network we investigate practical approaches taken to tackle arising tensions.
机译:背景技术过去十年来,众多公民科学项目蓬勃发展,涉及从研究到推广的一系列目标。尽管有些主要集中在收集严格的科学数据上,而另一些则着眼于梯度的公众参与,但大多数举措都试图在两者之间取得平衡。尽管实现多个目标可以被视为“双赢”的局面,但它也可能带来重大挑战,因为将资源分配给一个要素意味着它们可能会被转移到另一个要素上。在这里,我们分析了一个这样的程序,该程序着手在这些可以说是两极分化的目标之间找到有效的平衡。通过露天实验室(OPAL)计划的镜头,我们探索了在来自独立公民科学评估框架的四个指标下遇到的固有取舍。借鉴OPAL网络的经验,我们研究了解决紧张局势的实际方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号