首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): a randomised controlled trial protocol
【2h】

Integrated versus nOn-integrated Peripheral inTravenous catheter. Which Is the most effective systeM for peripheral intravenoUs catheter Management? (The OPTIMUM study): a randomised controlled trial protocol

机译:一体式静脉导管与非一体式外周静脉导管。哪种方法对外周静脉导管管理最有效? (最佳研究):随机对照试验方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionPeripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are frequently used in hospitals. However, PIVC complications are common, with failures leading to treatment delays, additional procedures, patient pain and discomfort, increased clinician workload and substantially increased healthcare costs. Recent evidence suggests integrated PIVC systems may be more effective than traditional non-integrated PIVC systems in reducing phlebitis, infiltration and costs and increasing functional dwell time. The study aim is to determine the efficacy, cost–utility and acceptability to patients and professionals of an integrated PIVC system compared with a non-integrated PIVC system.
机译:简介在医院中经常使用外围静脉导管(PIVC)。但是,PIVC并发症很常见,失败导致治疗延迟,附加程序,患者疼痛和不适,临床医生的工作量增加以及医疗费用大幅增加。最近的证据表明,集成式PIVC系统在减少静脉炎,渗透和成本以及增加功能停留时间方面可能比传统的非集成式PIVC系统更有效。该研究的目的是确定与非集成PIVC系统相比,集成PIVC系统对患者和专业人员的功效,成本效用和可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号