首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >PTED study: design of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
【2h】

PTED study: design of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) versus open microdiscectomy for patients with a symptomatic lumbar disc herniation

机译:PTED研究:设计一项非劣效随机对照试验比较有症状的腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮经孔椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED)与开放式微盘切除术的有效性和成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionLumbosacral radicular syndrome is often caused by a disc herniation. The standard surgical technique to remove a disc herniation is open microdiscectomy. An alternative technique is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), which is less invasive. In the Netherlands, PTED is not currently considered as standard care, and therefore not reimbursed within public health insurance. A pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial has been designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PTED versus open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
机译:简介腰L部神经根综合征通常是由椎间盘突出症引起的。去除椎间盘突出症的标准手术技术是开放式微盘切除术。另一种技术是经皮经孔椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术(PTED),这种方法的侵入性较小。在荷兰,PTED目前不被视为标准护理,因此未在公共健康保险中报销。设计了一个实用,多中心,非劣效,随机对照试验,以确定PTED与开放式微盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效性和成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号