首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brazilian Journal of Microbiology >Comparison of three decontamination methods for Mycobacterium bovis isolation
【2h】

Comparison of three decontamination methods for Mycobacterium bovis isolation

机译:牛分枝杆菌三种去污方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sixty samples of tissue fragments with lesions suggestive of tuberculosis from bovine abattoirs, kept in saturated solution of sodium borate, were subjected to four treatments: 4% NaOH (Petroff Method), 12 % H2SO4 and 1.5% HPC (1-Hexadecylpyridinium Chloride) decontamination, and physiological saline solution (control). The HPC method showed the lowest contamination rate (3%) when compared to control (88%, p<0.001), NaOH (33%, p<0.001) and H2SO4 (21.7%, p<0.002). Regarding the isolation success, the HPC method was better (40%) than the control (3%, p<0.001), NaOH (13%, p=0.001) and H2SO4 (1.7%, p<0.001) methods. These results indicate that HPC is an alternative to the Petroff method.
机译:将60份牛屠宰场提示有结核病灶的组织碎片样品保存在硼酸钠饱和溶液中,进行四种处理:4%NaOH(Petroff方法),12%H2SO4和1.5%HPC(1-十六烷基氯化吡啶鎓)去污。和生理盐水溶液(对照)。与对照(88%,p <0.001),NaOH(33%,p <0.001)和H2SO4(21.7%,p <0.002)相比,HPC方法显示出最低的污染率(3%)。关于分离成功,HPC方法优于对照方法(3%,p <0.001),NaOH(13%,p = 0.001)和H2SO4(1.7%,p <0.001)方法(40%)。这些结果表明,HPC是彼得罗夫方法的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号