首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Cumulative meta-analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology.
【2h】

Cumulative meta-analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology.

机译:累积荟萃分析:一种用于检测生态环境中的时间趋势和出版偏向的新工具。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Temporal changes in the magnitude of research findings have recently been recognized as a general phenomenon in ecology, and have been attributed to the delayed publication of non-significant results and disconfirming evidence. Here we introduce a method of cumulative meta-analysis which allows detection of both temporal trends and publication bias in the ecological literature. To illustrate the application of the method, we used two datasets from recently conducted meta-analyses of studies testing two plant defence theories. Our results revealed three phases in the evolution of the treatment effects. Early studies strongly supported the hypothesis tested, but the magnitude of the effect decreased considerably in later studies. In the latest studies, a trend towards an increase in effect size was observed. In one of the datasets, a cumulative meta-analysis revealed publication bias against studies reporting disconfirming evidence; such studies were published in journals with a lower impact factor compared to studies with results supporting the hypothesis tested. Correlation analysis revealed neither temporal trends nor evidence of publication bias in the datasets analysed. We thus suggest that cumulative meta-analysis should be used as a visual aid to detect temporal trends and publication bias in research findings in ecology in addition to the correlative approach.
机译:研究发现大小的时间变化最近已被认为是生态学中的普遍现象,并且归因于非重要结果的延迟发布和证据不足。在这里,我们介绍一种累积荟萃分析的方法,该方法可以检测生态文学中的时间趋势和出版偏向。为了说明该方法的应用,我们使用了来自最近进行的荟萃分析的两个数据集,这些研究对两种植物防御理论进行了测试。我们的结果揭示了治疗效果演变的三个阶段。早期的研究强烈支持检验的假设,但后来的研究却大大降低了影响的程度。在最新研究中,观察到了效应大小增加的趋势。在其中一个数据集中,一项累积的荟萃分析显示出出版偏向于报告不确定证据的研究。与具有支持所检验假设的结果的研究相比,此类研究在影响因子较低的期刊上发表。相关性分析未显示分析数据集中的时间趋势或出版偏见的证据。因此,我们建议,除相关方法外,还应将累积荟萃分析用作视觉辅助,以检测生态学研究结果中的时间趋势和出版偏向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号