首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chemical Science >The IPEA dilemma in CASPT2
【2h】

The IPEA dilemma in CASPT2

机译:CASPT2中的IPEA困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multi-configurational second order perturbation theory (CASPT2) has become a very popular method for describing excited-state properties since its development in 1990. To account for systematic errors found in the calculation of dissociation energies, an empirical correction applied to the zeroth-order Hamiltonian, called the IPEA shift, was introduced in 2004. The errors were attributed to an unbalanced description of open-shell versus closed-shell electronic states and is believed to also lead to an underestimation of excitation energies. Here we show that the use of the IPEA shift is not justified and the IPEA should not be used to calculate excited states, at least for organic chromophores. This conclusion is the result of three extensive analyses. Firstly, we survey the literature for excitation energies of organic molecules that have been calculated with the unmodified CASPT2 method. We find that the excitation energies of 356 reference values are negligibly underestimated by 0.02 eV. This value is an order of magnitude smaller than the expected error based on the calculation of dissociation energies. Secondly, we perform benchmark full configuration interaction calculations on 137 states of 13 di- and triatomic molecules and compare the results with CASPT2. Also in this case, the excited states are underestimated by only 0.05 eV. Finally, we perform CASPT2 calculations with different IPEA shift values on 309 excited states of 28 organic small and medium-sized organic chromophores. We demonstrate that the size of the IPEA correction scales with the amount of dynamical correlation energy (and thus with the size of the system), and gets immoderate already for the molecules considered here, leading to an overestimation of the excitation energies. It is also found that the IPEA correction strongly depends on the size of the basis set. The dependency on both the size of the system and of the basis set, contradicts the idea of a universal IPEA shift which is able to compensate for systematic CASPT2 errors in the calculation of excited states.
机译:自1990年发展以来,多构型二阶摄动理论(CASPT2)已成为描述激发态性质的一种非常流行的方法。为解决在解离能的计算中发现的系统误差,对零阶进行了经验校正哈密​​顿量,称为IPEA位移,于2004年引入。这些误差归因于开壳电子状态与闭壳电子状态的不平衡描述,并且据信也会导致激发能的低估。在这里,我们证明使用IPEA位移是不合理的,并且至少对于有机发色团,不应将IPEA用于计算激发态。该结论是三个广泛分析的结果。首先,我们调查了用未经修饰的CASPT2方法计算出的有机分子的激发能的文献。我们发现356个参考值的激励能量被低估了0.02 eV。该值比基于解离能的计算的预期误差小一个数量级。其次,我们对13个双原子和三原子分子的137个状态进行基准完全配置相互作用计算,并将结果与​​CASPT2进行比较。同样在这种情况下,激发态仅被低估了0.05 eV。最后,我们对28种有机中小分子生色团的309个激发态进行了不同IPEA位移值的CASPT2计算。我们证明了IPEA校正的大小随动态相关能量的大小而定(因此也随系统的大小而定),并且对于此处考虑的分子而言已经变得不适当,从而导致对激发能的高估。还发现,IPEA修正在很大程度上取决于基础集的大小。对系统大小和基集大小的依赖与通用IPEA偏移的思想相矛盾,该偏移能够补偿激发态计算中的系统CASPT2错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号