首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice >Polypharmacy Definitions for Multimorbid Older Adults Need Stronger Foundations to Guide Research Clinical Practice and Public Health
【2h】

Polypharmacy Definitions for Multimorbid Older Adults Need Stronger Foundations to Guide Research Clinical Practice and Public Health

机译:多种病态老年人的多药定义需要更坚实的基础来指导研究临床实践和公共卫生

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are numerous definitions of polypharmacy to describe the use of many medications among older adults, but there is a need to clarify if they are purposive and meaningful. By means of a systematic review, we identified definitions of polypharmacy used in multimorbid older adults (≥65 years). We evaluated if the definitions align among the domains of research, clinical practice, and public health and appraised whether concepts of polypharmacy are based on strong foundations. More than 46 definitions of polypharmacy were retrieved from 348 publications (research: n = 243; clinical practice: n = 88; public health: n = 17). Several thresholds based on the number of medications were mentioned. The majority of the publications (n = 202, 58%) used a minimal threshold of five medications. Heterogeneous qualitative definitions were identified, mostly stating that polypharmacy is “more drugs than needed”. There was no significant divergence between domains as to the type of definitions used, although qualitative definitions were more common in clinical practice. Nearly half (n = 156, 47%) of the publications provided no justification for the polypharmacy definition used. The wide variety of definitions for polypharmacy precludes comparisons, appropriate identification and management of polypharmacy in multimorbid older adults. Standardized definitions would allow more coherent judgments regarding the individual and collective stakes of polypharmacy.
机译:多种药物的定义可以描述老年人使用多种药物,但是有必要弄清楚它们是否是有目的性的和有意义的。通过系统的审查,我们确定了多病态老年人(≥65岁)中使用的多药店的定义。我们评估了定义是否在研究,临床实践和公共卫生领域之间保持一致,并评估了多元药学的概念是否建立在牢固的基础上。从348个出版物中检索了46种以上的多药店定义(研究:n = 243;临床实践:n = 88;公共卫生:n = 17)。提到了基于药物数量的几个阈值。大多数出版物(n = 202,58%)使用五种药物的最低阈值。确定了异质的定性定义,主要是说多元药房“比需要的药物更多”。尽管定性定义在临床实践中更为普遍,但使用的定义类型在域之间没有显着差异。近一半(n = 156,47%)的出版物没有提供所使用的多药店定义的理由。多种药物的定义排除了对多病态老年人的多种药物的比较,适当的识别和管理。标准化的定义将允许对多元药房的个人和集体利益进行更连贯的判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号