首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Maximum Strength Development and Volume-Load during Concurrent High Intensity Intermittent Training Plus Strength or Strength-Only Training
【2h】

Maximum Strength Development and Volume-Load during Concurrent High Intensity Intermittent Training Plus Strength or Strength-Only Training

机译:同时进行高强度间歇训练加上力量训练或仅力量训练时的最大力量发展和容量负荷

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare maximal strength gains during strength training (ST) and concurrent training (CT) consisting of high-intensity intermittent training plus strength training over the course of a 12-week intervention. A secondary purpose was to examine the relationship between strength training volume and strength gain in both groups. Nineteen recreationally active males were divided into CT (n = 11) and ST (n = 8) groups. The CT group performed repeated 1 min efforts at 100% of maximal aerobic speed interspersed by 1 min of passive recovery until accumulating a total running distance of 5km followed by a strength session (consisting of three sets of seven exercises with loads of 8-12 repetition maximum) twice weekly for a period of 12 weeks. The ST group performed only strength training sessions during the same 12-week period. Strength training total volume-load (Σ repetitions x load) for the upper- and lower-body was computed, while maximal strength (1RM) was evaluated at baseline, week 8, and week 12. Lower-body volume-load over 12 weeks was not different between groups. Absolute 1RM increased in both groups at week 8 and week 12, while 1RM relative to body mass increased in both groups at week 8, but only ST increased relative maximum strength between week 8 and week 12. There was a statistically significant correlation between strength training lower-body volume-load and maximum strength change between baseline and week 8 for the CT group (r = 0.656), while no significant correlations were found for the ST group. In summary, executing high-intensity intermittent exercise twice a week before strength training did not impair maximal strength after 8 weeks, however, only ST demonstrated an increase in relative strength after 12 weeks.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">The combination of HIIT with strength exercises in the same session (aerobic followed by strength), may be employed during training in order to improve both capacities (aerobic and strength).Maximal strength gains were not different between groups after 8 weeks, however only ST increased relative maximal strength between 8 and 12 weeks.There was correlation between strength training lower-body volume-load and maximum strength change between baseline and week 8 for the CT group.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较力量训练(ST)和同时训练(CT)在12周的干预过程中包括高强度间歇训练和力量训练的最大力量增长。第二个目的是检查两组力量训练量与力量增加之间的关系。 19名娱乐活跃的男性分为CT组(n = 11)和ST组(n = 8)。 CT组以最大有氧速度的100%进行1分钟重复练习,并散布1分钟被动恢复,直到累积总跑步距离为5km,然后进行力量训练(包括三组,每组7个练习,重复8-12次负荷最多),每周两次,为期12周。在相同的12周期间,ST组仅进行了力量训练。计算上半身和下半身的力量训练总体积负荷(Σ重复x负荷),而在基线,第8周和第12周评估最大强度(1RM)。12周内下半身体积负荷组之间没有什么不同。在第8周和第12周,两组的绝对1RM均升高,而在第8周时,两组相对于体重的1RM均升高,但在第8周和第12周之间,只有ST升高了相对最大力量。 CT组在基线和第8周之间的下半身体积负荷和最大强度变化(r = 0.656),而ST组则没有显着相关性。总而言之,在力量训练之前每周进行两次高强度间歇锻炼并不会损害8周后的最大力量,但是只有ST在12周后表现出相对力量的增加。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc“> <!-list-behavior =无序前缀-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> HIIT与力量练习的组合阶段(有氧训练然后是力量训练),可以在训练过程中采用,以同时提高运动能力(有氧训练和力量训练)。 最大的力量增加在8周后两组之间没有差异,但是只有ST相对最大

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号