首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tobacco Control >Old ways new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement
【2h】

Old ways new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement

机译:旧的方式新的手段:自总体解决方案以来烟草业为学术界和私营部门科学家提供资金

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When, as a condition of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) in 1998, US tobacco companies disbanded the Council for Tobacco Research and the Center for Indoor Air Research, they lost a vital connection to scientists in academia and the private sector. The aim of this paper was to investigate two new research projects funded by US tobacco companies by analysis of internal tobacco industry documents now available at the University of California San Francisco (San Francisco, California, USA) Legacy tobacco documents library, other websites and the open scientific literature. Since the MSA, individual US tobacco companies have replaced their industry‐wide collaborative granting organisations with new, individual research programmes. Philip Morris has funded a directed research project through the non‐profit Life Sciences Research Office, and British American Tobacco and its US subsidiary Brown and Williamson have funded the non‐profit Institute for Science and Health. Both of these organisations have downplayed or concealed their true level of involvement with the tobacco industry. Both organisations have key members with significant and long‐standing financial relationships with the tobacco industry. Regulatory officials and policy makers need to be aware that the studies these groups publish may not be as independent as they seem.
机译:1998年,根据《总体解决协议》(MSA)的条件,美国烟草公司解散了烟草研究委员会和室内空气研究中心,因此它们与学术界和私营部门的科学家失去了至关重要的联系。本文的目的是通过分析美国加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(现为美国加利福尼亚州旧金山市)的传统烟草文件库,其他网站和美国烟草公司提供的内部烟草业文件,对美国烟草公司资助的两个新研究项目进行调查。开放科学文献。自MSA以来,美国的各个烟草公司已用新的个体研究计划代替了其在整个行业范围内的合作资助组织。菲利普·莫里斯(Philip Morris)通过非营利性生命科学研究所资助了一项定向研究项目,英美烟草公司及其美国子公司布朗和威廉姆森也资助了非营利性科学与健康研究所。这两个组织都轻描淡写或掩盖了他们参与烟草业的真实水平。这两个组织的主要成员均与烟草业有着重要且长期的财务关系。监管官员和政策制定者需要意识到,这些团体发表的研究报告可能并不像看起来那样独立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号