首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tobacco Control >Hand rolling cigarette papers as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety
【2h】

Hand rolling cigarette papers as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety

机译:手动卷烟纸作为规范卷烟防火安全的参考点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: To compare the burning characteristics of the tobacco and paper of manufactured and hand rolled cigarettes, and set a fire safety standard of manufacture to largely reduce the fire risk from discarded cigarettes. >Methods: (1) Cigarette extinction test of ignition strength: 40 cigarettes per brand, lit and placed on 15 layers of filter paper, in accordance with ASTM test standard E2187-02. (2) Citrate extracted by 0.1N hydrochloric acid from cigarette papers and from tobacco in manufactured cigarettes, the supernatant analysed by high performance liquid chromatography using ultraviolet visual light spectrophotometer. (3) Survey of 750 nationally representative adults age 18 years and over, by telephone, including 184 smokers. >Materials: (a) New Zealand made Holiday, and Horizon, and US made Marlboro manufactured cigarettes; (b) US manufactured Merit with banded paper; (c) Holiday, Horizon and Marlboro hand rolling tobaccos, hand rolled in Rizla cigarette papers; (d) manufactured cigarettes as in (a), reconstructed using Rizla hand rolling cigarette papers. >Results: 1. (a) For each brand of manufactured cigarettes, 40/40 burnt full length; (b) for Merit banded paper cigarettes 29/40 (73%) burnt full length; (c) for each brand of hand rolled cigarettes 0/40 burnt full length; (d) 0/40 manufactured cigarettes reconstructed with Rizla hand rolling paper burnt full length. 2. Citrate content: (a) In manufactured cigarette papers: 0.3–0.8 mg; in tobacco of manufactured cigarettes: Holiday 0, Horizon 0, Marlboro 8.8 mg; (b) Merit: in banded paper 0.418 mg; in tobacco 10.23 mg; (c) In hand rolled cigarettes: in the papers < 0.08 mg; in hand rolled tobacco 13.3–15.0 mg; (d) In hand rolling papers of reconstructed cigarettes: < 0.018 mg. 3. Requiring manufactured cigarettes to compulsorily self-extinguish when left unattended was supported by 67% of smokers, 61% of manufactured cigarette smokers, 82% of hand rolled smokers, and by 68% of non-smokers. >Conclusion: The wrapping paper is a key determinant of whether or not unpuffed cigarettes burn their full length. Using international test methods, popular brands of manufactured cigarettes all burnt full length, but none did so when re-wrapped in hand rolling cigarette paper. This provides a ready-to-hand smoker acceptable standard for reducing ignition potential from manufactured cigarettes, as a basis for regulation or litigation.
机译:>目标:比较制成的和手卷香烟的烟草和纸张的燃烧特性,并制定制造的消防安全标准,以大大降低废弃香烟的着火风险。 >方法:(1)点燃强度的香烟消光试验:每个品牌40支香烟,点燃并放置在15层滤纸上,符合ASTM测试标准E2187-02。 (2)用0.1N盐酸从卷烟纸和制成的卷烟中的烟草中提取柠檬酸盐,并使用紫外可见光分光光度计通过高效液相色谱法分析上清液。 (3)通过电话调查了750名18岁及以上的具有国家代表性的成年人,其中包括184名吸烟者。 >材料:(a)新西兰制造Holiday,而地平线制造,而美国制造万宝路制造的香烟; (b)美国制造的带条纹纸的优点; (c)Holiday,Horizo​​n和Marlboro手卷烟草,用Rizla卷烟纸手卷; (d)使用Rizla手卷香烟纸重建的(a)中制成的香烟。 >结果:1.(a)对于每个品牌的卷烟,其全长燃烧40/40; (b)优点29/40的带状纸卷烟(73%)全长燃烧; (c)每品牌手卷烟的总长度燃烧为0/40; (d)用Rizla手卷纸重建的0/40制成卷烟燃烧全长。 2.柠檬酸盐含量:(a)在制成的卷烟纸中:0.3–0.8 mg;在制成的香烟的烟草中:假日0,地平线0,万宝路8.8毫克; (b)优点:在带状纸中为0.418毫克;烟草中为10.23毫克; (c)手卷香烟:≤0.08毫克的纸;手卷烟13.3–15.0 mg; (d)重建香烟的手卷纸:<0.018 mg。 3. 67%的吸烟者,61%的人造香烟吸烟者,82%的手卷吸烟者和68%的非吸烟者支持在无人看管的情况下强制制造的香烟自动熄灭。 >结论:包装纸是决定无烟香烟是否燃烧其全长的关键因素。使用国际测试方法,流行品牌的制造卷烟全部燃烧全长,但是当将其重新包裹在手卷烟纸中时,没有一个燃烧。这提供了一个现成的吸烟者可接受的标准,以减少制成的卷烟的点燃可能性,以此作为管制或诉讼的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号