首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology >Randomized controlled pilot study comparing large-volume paracentesis using wall suction and traditional glass vacuum bottle methods
【2h】

Randomized controlled pilot study comparing large-volume paracentesis using wall suction and traditional glass vacuum bottle methods

机译:随机对照试验研究比较了使用壁吸法和传统玻璃真空瓶法进行的大体积穿刺术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives:Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) can be time and labor intensive depending on the amount of ascites removed and the method of drainage. Wall suction has been adopted as the preferred method of drainage at many centers, though the safety and benefits of this technique have not been formally evaluated. The primary objective of this study was to define the cost and time savings of wall suction over the traditional glass vacuum bottle method for ascites drainage. The secondary objective was to compare the safety profile and patient satisfaction using these two techniques.
机译:目的:大体积穿刺术(LVP)可能需要大量时间和精力,具体取决于去除的腹水量和引流方法。尽管尚未对这种技术的安全性和益处进行正式评估,但在许多中心,墙壁吸水已被用作排水的首选方法。这项研究的主要目的是确定与传统的玻璃真空瓶腹水引流方法相比,壁吸术的成本和时间节省。次要目标是使用这两种技术比较安全性和患者满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号