首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >An evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes for older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【2h】

An evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes for older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:老年医学主导的老年医学综合评估对改善老年人患者和医疗系统结局的比较有效性的评估:系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an integrated model of care involving a geriatrician and an interdisciplinary team and can prioritize and manage complex health needs of older adults with multimorbidity. CGAs differ across healthcare settings, ranging from shared care conducted in primary care settings to specialized inpatient units in acute care. Models of care involving geriatricians vary across healthcare settings, and it is unclear which CGA model is most effective. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the comparative effectiveness of various geriatrician-led CGAs and to identify which models improve patient and healthcare system level outcomes.
机译:背景技术老年病综合评估(CGA)是涉及老年病专家和跨学科团队的综合护理模型,可以优先考虑和管理患有多种疾病的老年人的复杂健康需求。 CGA在不同的医疗机构中都不同,从在初级医疗机构中进行的共享医疗到急诊中的专门住院单元。涉及老年医学的护理模式因医疗机构而异,目前尚不清楚哪种CGA模式最有效。我们的目标是进行系统的审查和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以检查各种由老年科医生领导的CGA的比较效果,并确定哪些模型可以改善患者和医疗系统水平的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号