首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SSM - Population Health >Methods of measuring associations between the Retail Food Environment and weight status: Importance of classifications and metrics
【2h】

Methods of measuring associations between the Retail Food Environment and weight status: Importance of classifications and metrics

机译:衡量零售食品环境与体重状况之间关系的方法:分类和指标的重要性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite considerable research, evidence supporting associations between the ‘Retail Food Environment’ (RFE) and obesity remains mixed. Differences in the methods used to measure the RFE may explain this heterogeneity. Using data on a large (n = 10,111) sample of adults from the Yorkshire Health Study (UK), we modelled cross-sectional associations between the RFE and weight status using (i) multiple definitions of ‘Fast Food’, ‘Convenience’ and ‘Supermarkets’ and (ii) multiple RFE metrics, identified in a prior systematic review to be common in the literature. Both the choice of outlet definition and the choice of RFE metric substantively impacted observed associations with weight status. Findings differed in relation to statistical significance, effect sizes, and directions of association. This study provides novel evidence that the diversity of RFE measurement methods is contributing to heterogeneous study findings and conflicting policy messages. Greater attention is needed when selecting and communicating RFE measures in research.
机译:尽管进行了大量研究,但支持“零售食品环境”(RFE)与肥胖之间联系的证据仍然混杂。测量RFE的方法不同可能解释了这种异质性。使用来自约克郡健康研究(英国)的大量成年人(n = 10,111)样本数据,我们使用(i)“快餐”,“便利”和“饮食”的多种定义对RFE和体重状况之间的横断面关联进行建模。 “超市”和(ii)多个RFE指标,这些指标在先前的系统回顾中被确定为文献中常见的指标。出口定义的选择和RFE度量的选择都极大地影响了观察到的与体重状态的关联。结果在统计学意义,效应大小和关联方向方面存在差异。这项研究提供了新颖的证据,表明RFE测量方法的多样性正在导致异类研究结果和政策信息冲突。在研究中选择和交流RFE措施时需要更多的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号