首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Reproductive Health >Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review
【2h】

Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review

机译:妇女为分娩和产科使用药理和非药理止痛方法的经验:定性的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMany women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain relief during childbirth. Evidence from Cochrane reviews shows that effective pain relief is not always associated with high maternal satisfaction scores. However, understanding women’s views is important for good quality maternity care provision. We undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis of women’s views and experiences of pharmacological (epidural, opioid analgesia) and non-pharmacological (relaxation, massage techniques) pain relief options, to understand what affects women’s decisions and choices and to inform guidelines, policy, and practice.
机译:背景许多妇女在分娩时使用药理学或非药理学的止痛药。 Cochrane评估的证据表明,有效的疼痛缓解并不总是与较高的孕产妇满意度得分相关。但是,了解妇女的观点对于提供高质量的产妇护理很重要。我们对妇女的药理(硬膜外,阿片类镇痛)和非药理(松弛,按摩技术)缓解疼痛的观点和经验进行了定性证据综合研究,以了解影响妇女决策和选择的因素,并提供指导方针,政策和实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号