首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Rare Tumors >Comparative Outcome of Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Partial Nephrectomy or Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma
【2h】

Comparative Outcome of Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Partial Nephrectomy or Radical Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma

机译:CT扫描引导下经皮射频消融部分肾切除术或根治性肾切除术治疗T1期肾细胞癌的比较结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 3% of all cancers in adults. The indications for Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for renal carcinomas include T1a (tumor 4 cm or less, limited to the kidney), elderly patients, renal impairment, comorbidities, poor surgical candidate, and multiple bilateral renal masses. We retrospectively reviewed medical records, specifically investigating the indications, complications and outcomes of RFA and nephrectomy for treatment of RCC in a tertiary medical center with a predominantly Hispanic patient population. Forty-nine patients with RCC were evaluated. Nine patients had RFA, 9 had partial nephrectomy and 31 had radical nephrectomy. All patients among the 3 groups had stage T1N0M0 RCC at diagnosis. Tumor recurrence was observed in 2 (22%) patients that had RFA, one (11%) patient that had partial nephrectomy and no patients that had radical nephrectomy. One patient had recurrence of the tumor at the opposite kidney pole from the initial RFA site 4 years later. This particular patient did not have any tumor recurrence at the site of the initial RFA. A second RFA was performed on the recurrent tumor with no recurrence upon subsequent follow up visits. The second patient had recurrence of the RCC on 1 year follow that was discovered to be sarcomatoid RCC, which is an aggressive type with a poor prognosis. Our results support the clinical utility of RFA in patients with stage T1 RCC who are poor surgical candidates or those with reduced renal function. The clinical utility of RFA as an equally effective approach when compared to partial nephrectomy in patients with stage T1 RCC that meet strict indications for the procedure. The treatment choice should be individualized and based on the characteristics of the renal tumor such as size, location and histological type of RCC. We conclude that RFA presents a safe treatment choice for patients with RCC if long term follow up is maintained.
机译:肾细胞癌(RCC)占成人所有癌症的3%。肾癌的射频消融术(RFA)适应症包括T1a(肿瘤小于等于4厘米,仅限于肾脏),老年患者,肾功能不全,合并症,较差的手术治疗对象和多发性双侧肾脏肿块。我们回顾性审查了病历,特别是在西班牙裔患者占多数的三级医疗中心研究了RFA和肾切除术治疗RCC的适应症,并发症和结局。评估了49例RCC患者。 9例行RFA,9例行部分肾切除,31例行根治性肾切除。 3组中的所有患者在诊断时均具有T1N0M0期RCC。在2名(22%)患有RFA的患者,1名(11%)进行部分肾切除术的患者和未进行根治性肾切除术的患者中观察到肿瘤复发。 4年后,一名患者从最初的RFA部位在相对的肾极处复发了肿瘤。该特定患者在最初的RFA部位没有任何肿瘤复发。对复发的肿瘤进行第二次RFA,随后的随访中无复发。第二例患者在1年后出现RCC复发,被发现是肉瘤样RCC,这是一种侵袭性类型,预后较差。我们的结果支持RFA在T1期RCC患者中的临床应用,这些患者手术候选者差或肾功能不佳。在符合严格手术指征的T1期RCC患者中,与部分肾切除术相比,RFA的临床效用同等有效。治疗选择应个体化,并应基于肾肿瘤的特征,例如RCC的大小,位置和组织学类型。我们得出结论,如果维持长期随访,RFA为RCC患者提供了安全的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号