首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >PNAS Plus: Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration
【2h】

PNAS Plus: Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration

机译:PNAS Plus:河口集水区尺度失配的社会生态网络分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Resource management boundaries seldom align with environmental systems, which can lead to social and ecological problems. Mapping and analyzing how resource management organizations in different areas collaborate can provide vital information to help overcome such misalignment. Few quantitative approaches exist, however, to analyze social collaborations alongside environmental patterns, especially among local and regional organizations (i.e., in multilevel governance settings). This paper develops and applies such an approach using social–ecological network analysis (SENA), which considers relationships among and between social and ecological units. The framework and methods are shown using an estuary restoration case from Puget Sound, United States. Collaboration patterns and quality are analyzed among local and regional organizations working in hydrologically connected areas. These patterns are correlated with restoration practitioners’ assessments of the productivity of their collaborations to inform network theories for natural resource governance. The SENA is also combined with existing ecological data to jointly consider social and ecological restoration concerns. Results show potentially problematic areas in nearshore environments, where collaboration networks measured by density (percentage of possible network connections) and productivity are weakest. Many areas also have high centralization (a few nodes hold the network together), making network cohesion dependent on key organizations. Although centralization and productivity are inversely related, no clear relationship between density and productivity is observed. This research can help practitioners to identify where governance capacity needs strengthening and jointly consider social and ecological concerns. It advances SENA by developing a multilevel approach to assess social–ecological (or social–environmental) misalignments, also known as scale mismatches.
机译:资源管理的界限很少与环境系统保持一致,这可能导致社会和生态问题。映射和分析不同区域中的资源管理组织如何协作可以提供重要信息,以帮助克服这种错位。但是,很少有定量方法可以分析环境模式下的社会合作,特别是在地方和区域组织之间(即在多级治理环境中)。本文使用社会生态网络分析(SENA)开发并应用了这种方法,该方法考虑了社会与生态单位之间的关系。使用美国Puget Sound的河口修复案例展示了该框架和方法。分析了在水文连通地区工作的地方和区域组织之间的协作模式和质量。这些模式与恢复从业人员对其协作生产力的评估相关联,以为自然资源治理提供网络理论依据。 SENA还与现有的生态数据结合在一起,共同考虑社会和生态恢复问题。结果表明,在近海环境中可能存在问题的区域,其中以密度(可能的网络连接百分比)和生产率衡量的协作网络最弱。许多区域还具有很高的集中度(几个节点将网络保持在一起),使得网络的凝聚力取决于关键组织。尽管集中化和生产率成反比,但没有观察到密度与生产率之间的明确关系。这项研究可以帮助从业人员确定需要加强治理能力的地方,并共同考虑社会和生态问题。它通过开发一种评估社会-生态(或社会-环境)失调(也称为规模失配)的多层次方法来推进SENA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号